Medical Students’ Attitudes and Learning Outcomes Regarding Virtual versus Traditional Teaching Methods in a General English Course

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of General Courses, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of General Courses, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Virtual education methods are rapidly increasing as the most prevalent approaches to teaching and learning globally. This study investigated medical students’ attitudes and learning outcomes regarding virtual versus traditional teaching methods in a general English course.
Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences during 2022-2023. The sample (n=107) consisted of all students enrolled in a general English course and selected through convenience sampling. Fifty percent of the English lessons were delivered virtually via Adobe Connect, the NAVID system, and, to a lesser extent, WhatsApp and Telegram App. The remaining lessons were presented in-person. Then, students completed an attitude questionnaire comparing virtual and traditional teaching methods. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS software V.21.
Results: The results showed the mean attitude score towards traditional and virtual education methods were 96.30±11.11 and 96.66±11.74, respectively. There was no significant difference in attitude scores between male and female students in both methods (p<0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in English test scores between genders (p=0.59). The Wilcoxon test indicated no significant difference between students’ attitudes towards virtual and traditional education (p=0.52). Additionally, no significant correlation was found between students’ grades and their attitudes towards either of the teaching methods (p=0.63).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that students’ attitudes towards virtual education were slightly more favorable than towards traditional education although the difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, virtual education can be considered a viable option for teaching theoretical courses.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aghakasiri Z, Fazelian P. Evaluation of virtual education programs of Tehran universities from the perspective teachers and students [Master Thesis]. Tehran: Tarbiat Moalem University. 2006.
  2. Manian D, Banici P. New outlooks of virtual education. Tehran: Shahrab, Ayandesazan publication. 2006, p.78–83.
  3. Amirazodi A. Teaching modern methods of distance education in higher education. In: Safari J, Fahimitabar H, Darb Joshghani A. Proceedings of the first conference of National Development of Virtual Universities Payam-Noor-Kashan. Kashan: Morsal Publication; 2004. 306.
  4. Shahbeigi F, Nazari S. Virtual education: Benefits and limitations. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2012;6(1):47-54. [https://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/files/site1/user_files_1227e1/admin-A-10-1-7-96a6ac6.pdf]
  5. Givehki R, Afshar H, Goli F, Scheidt CE, Omidi A, Davoudi M. Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on body image flexibility and body awareness in patients with psychosomatic disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Electronic Physician. 2018;10(7):7008. [https://doi: 10.19082/7008. eCollection 2018 Jul.]
  6. Horton W. Leading e-learning: American Society for Training and Development; 2001. [Online]. Available from http://www.elearninggurus.com/articles.html. [Accessed: Dec. 3, 2021].
  7. Fallon C, Brown S. E-learning standards: a guide to purchasing, developing, and deploying standards-conformant e-learning. CRC Press; 2002, p. 12 – p. 13. [https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420025330]
  8. Fani M, Moghimian M, Shojaee-Mend H, Khajavian N. Investigating the Knowledge and attitude of the Students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences towards virtual teaching in COVID-19 conditions. Journal of Educational Development of Judishapur. 2024;15(3):259-70. [https://doi: 10.22118/edc.2023.356978.2148]
  9. Tayem YI, Abo Hamza E, Deifalla A. Perceptions of medical students on distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study from Bahrain. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2022:345-54. [https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S357335]
  10. Shourcheh B, Heydari M, Moosivand M, et al. Investigate and Compare the Effect of In-person and Teacher-centered Education with Virtual Education in Learning the History of Islamic Culture and Civilization Course of Hamadan Medical Sciences Students. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. 2020;18(2):97-106. [http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/psj.18.2.97]
  11. Atwa H, Shehata MH, Al-Ansari A, et al. Online, face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and medical students' perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method study. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;9:791352. [https://doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352.]
  12. Joji RM, Kumar AP, Almarabheh A, Dar FK, et al. Perception of online and face to face microbiology laboratory sessions among medical students and faculty at Arabian Gulf University: a mixed method study. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):411. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03346-2]
  13. Elderdiri Gafar Osman S, Ahmed Basheir Abukaraig E, Mohamed Ahmed Elsheikh N, et al. Performance of Medical Laboratory Science Students in Online vs. Face-to-Face During COVID-19 at Alfajr College, Sudan 2020: A Comparative Analysis. Azerbaijan Med. J. 2022. 62 (10); 5963-75. [http://repository.fajr.edu.sd/handle/fajr/408]
  14. Elnour AA, Abou Hajal A, Goaddar R, et al. Exploring the pharmacy students’ perspectives on off-campus online learning experiences amid COVID-19 crises: A cross-sectional survey. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2023;31(7):1339-50. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2023.05.024]
  15. Kian M. Challenges of virtual education: a report of what are not learned. I Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2014;5(3):11-21. [https://ijvlms.sums.ac.ir/article_46114.html]