Examining the satisfaction of students from the personalized business design course in the field of health, in Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran in 2022-2023

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of E-learning in Medical Sciences, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Counseling, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran

10.22038/fmej.2024.75899.1572

Abstract

Background: Personalized business courses are an effective way to learn the basics of a business or industry. This study analyzed the effectiveness of the business course offered at Smart University of Medical Sciences.
Method: This study evaluated the personalized business course using retrospective data to assess learner satisfaction. The course was delivered entirely online but was flexible in delivery. It was designed according to the ASSURE educational model, which emphasizes content presentation and personalization of the learning experience. The course was attended by 132 participants. In this study, the validity of the data collection instrument was confirmed by ten SMUMS faculty members, after which a preliminary study was conducted with 10 pilot samples, yielding a Cronbach coefficient of 96%. For the translation into Persian, the World Health Organization guide was used as a methodological model.
Results: A total of 15 out of 18 participants from the Ministry of Science were satisfied with the course, as were 87 out of 107 participants from the Ministry of Health. Satisfaction with the course was higher among males than females, (84.6% versus 74.3%). The course was rated satisfactory by 81.4% of participants.
Conclusion: Satisfaction with the course may lead to similar courses being offered in the future. This personalized business course was a great success. Participants were satisfied with the content they learned and the progress they made.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. merriam-webster.com[Internet]. Springfield: Synonyms of innovation. [updated 2020 Feb9; Cited 2020 Feb27].Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/
  2. www.merriam-webster.com. . Springfield: Definition of Entrepreneur by Merriam-Webster [updated 2020 Feb9; Cited 2020 Feb27].Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/
  3. Hisrich RD. Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship. American psychologist. 1990;45(2):209
  4. Boore J, Porter S. Education for entrepreneurship in nursing. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(2):184-91.
  5. Antoncic B, Hisrich RD. Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of business venturing. 2001;16(5):495-527
  6. Mondoux S, Chan TM, Ankel F, Sklar DP. Teaching Quality Improvement in Emergency Medicine Training Programs: A Review of Best Practices. AEM Educ Train. 2017 Oct 17;1(4):301-309. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10052. PMID: 30051048; PMCID: PMC6001504.
  7. Juzwishin D, Bond K, editors. Cultivating excellence in leadership: Wicked problems and virtues. Healthcare Management Forum; 2012: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA;
  8. Hussain N, Ritchey T. Wicked problems. Eur J Ind Pharm. 2011;31:4-7
  9. Niccum BA, Sarker A, Wolf SJ, Trowbridge MJ. Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1360722.
  10. Jackson JK. Global economic effects of COVID-19. Congressional Research Service; 2021.
  11. Piperopoulos P, Dimov D. Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self‐efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of small business management. 2015;53(4):970-85
  12. unesco.org [Internet]. Bonn: Further reading on "Entrepreneurship education and training. [updated 2017 jun 9; Cited 2020 Feb27].Available from: https://unevoc.unesco.org
  13. theatlantic.com . [Internet]. Newyork: The Rise of the M.D./M.B.A. Degree. [Updated 2014; Cited 2020 Feb27].Available from: www.theatlantic.com .
  14. Brinton TJ, Kurihara CQ, Camarillo DB, Pietzsch JB, Gorodsky J, Zenios SA, Doshi R, Shen C, Kumar UN, Mairal A, Watkins J, Popp RL, Wang PJ, Makower J, Krummel TM, Yock PG. Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: the first 12 years of Stanford Biodesign. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;41(9):1803-10. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0761-2. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PMID: 23404074; PMCID: PMC3759560.
  15. Majmudar MD, Harrington RA, Brown NJ, Graham G, McConnell MV ‏. Clinician Innovator: A Novel Career Path in Academic Medicine A Presidentially Commissioned Article From the American Heart Association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(10):e001990.
  16. MAULIYA, Islahul; RELIANISA, Resty Zulema; ROKHYATI, Umy. Lack of motivation factors creating poor academic performance in the context of graduate English department students. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2020, 6.2: 73-85.‏
  17. Entezari Y. Building knowledge-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Case of Iran. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences. 2015;195:1206-15
  18. SMALDINO, Sharon E. Instructional technology and media for learning. 2008.‏ 10th ed. Boston. Pearson. p. 317-319.
  19. Heinich R, Molenda M, Russel J. Instructional media and the new tec. instruction. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1993
  20. Gustafson KL, Branch RM. What is instructional design. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. 2002;2:10-6
  21. Frey A, Faul A, Yankelov P. Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of social work education. 2003;39(3):443-57
  22. Wang C-H, Shannon DM, Ross ME. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education. 2013;34(3):302-23
  23. OYELERE, Solomon Sunday. Do teamwork experience and self-regulated learning determine the performance of students in an online educational technology course?. Education and Information Technologies, 2021, 26.5: 5311-5335.‏
  24. Sartorius N, Janca A. Psychiatric assessment instruments developed by the World Health Organization. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 1996;31(2):55-69.
  25. CARROLL, Cathryn A. Enhancing entrepreneurship and professionalism in medical informatics instruction: a collaborative training model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004, 11.4: 317-319.‏
  26. Servoss J, Chang C, Fay J, Ward K. The Early Tech Development Course: Experiential Commercialization Education for the Medical Academician. Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):506-510. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001515. PMID: 28351064; PMCID: PMC5367498.
  27. Servoss J, Chang C, Olson D, Ward KR, Mulholland MW, Cohen MS. The Surgery Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Program (SIEDP): An Experiential Learning Program for Surgery Faculty to Ideate and Implement Innovations in Health care. J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):935-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 6. PMID: 28989009; PMCID: PMC5886837.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 14, Issue 2
June 2024
Pages 38-43

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics