The Evaluation of Iranian midwifery Ph.D. course based on the CIPP model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of midwifery, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab. Iran

2 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

5 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Menopause Andropause Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

7 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

10.22038/fmej.2023.69528.1521

Abstract

Background: A high-quality Ph.D. course requires frequent assessment and identification of deficiencies and limitations. The midwifery Ph.D. course started in 2016 in Iran and since no evaluation has been performed on this program, the present study aimed to evaluate the Iranian midwifery Ph.D. course based on the CIPP model.
Method: This descriptive-evaluative research was conducted based on the CIPP model in 2021 in the schools of nursing and midwifery of Tabriz and Ahvaz Universities of medical sciences, Iran. The statistical population included the faculty members of the midwifery Ph.D. program (9 individuals) and midwifery Ph.D. graduates and students (21 individuals). The data collection tools comprised CIPP-based questionnaires exclusively for faculty members and students. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis.
Results: Most students (81%) and faculty members (77.8%) reported an appropriate general evaluation of the midwifery Ph.D. curriculum. Most faculty members (77.8%) and students (90.8%) reported the indicators of the midwifery Ph.D. curriculum as appropriate in terms of context. More than three forth of faculty members (77.8%) and more than half of the students (57.1%) reported this curriculum as appropriate regarding input. This program was also reported to be appropriate according to 52.4% of students and 66.7% of faculty members in terms of process. Furthermore, a total of 66.7% of participants in both groups reported an appropriate status in terms of output.
Conclusion: Midwifery Ph.D. curriculum was reported as an appropriate program. Also, students of this discipline requested greater stress on clinical upskilling for midwifery Ph.D.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Lori JR, Stalls S, Rominski S.D. Strengthening Midwifery to End Preventable Maternal, Child, and Newborn Deaths. JMWH.2015; 60(4): 343-7. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12341.
  2. Strengthening Midwifery: A background paper.2022. from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501965
  3. Noorabadi S, Musapour N, Aliasgari M, et al. Evaluating the Quality of Interdisciplinary Curricula of Humanities In Iranian Higher Education. Theory & Practice in Curriculum Journal.2015; 2 (4): 61-84.
  4. Primrose K, Alexander CR. Curriculum development and implementation: factors contributing towards curriculum development in Zimbabwe higher education system. European Social Sciences Research Journal. 2013: 1(1); 55-65.
  5. Modarres M, Geranmayeh M, Amini M, Toosi M. Clinical placements as a challenging opportunity in midwifery education: A qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2022; 9(2):1015-1027. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1139.
  6. Jiang Zh, Yin J. Role of Program Curriculum in Building Social Skills and Sports Coaching in Academic and Career Development Under Sports Humanities and Sociology. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852331.
  7. Khayyati F, Shahab JA, Lotfizadeh M. Developing and Introducing a New Curriculum for Apprenticeship of Public Health Students in Bachelor Level in 2009. Journal of health. 2013; 3 (4):81-93.
  8. Saadat Talab A. Investigating the Approach of University Administrators towards the Change of Curriculum in University and Institutes of Higher Education. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2018; 8(23): 201-22.
  9. Stufflebeam, DL. The CIPP model for evaluation. The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.2003.
  10. Sahebihag MH, Khadivi AA, Soheili A, Moghbeli G, KhajeGoudari M, Valizadeh L. The challenges of nursing doctoral curriculum in Iran: a critical look based on Delphi technique. The J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2017;15(6):424-39.
  11. Abdi Shahshahani M, Ehsanpour S, Yamani N, Kohen Sh. The evaluation of reproductive health PhD program in Iran: The input indicators analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014; 19(6):620-8.
  12. American College of Nurse Midwives. The practice doctorate in midwifery. (2011).

Available from: http://www.midwife.org/ACNM/files/ACNMLibraryData/UPLOADFILENAME/000000000260/Practice%20Doctorate%20in%20Midwifery %20Sept%202011.pdf.

  1. Yamani N, Shakour M, Ehsanpour S. Educational needs of reproductive health students: A Delphi study. JMED. 2013; 8 (2). URL: http://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-134-fa.html.
  2. Parry N. Needs Assessment in Continuing Medical Education. EMWA. 2014; 23(2). doi: 10.1179/2047480614Z.000000000214.
  3. Farahani M, Ahmadi F. Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2006; 6 (1) :83-92.
    URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-188-fa.html
  4. Ja Kim M, Gi Park C, Kim M, Lee H, Ahn YH, Kim E, et al. Quality of nursing doctoral education in Korea: towards policy development. J Adv Nurs. 2012; 68(7):1494-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05885.x.
  5. Moonaghi HK, Valizadehzare N, Khorashadizadeh F. PhD programs in nursing in Iran and Canada: A qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017; 67(6):863-68.
  6. Tazakori Z, Mazaheri E, Namnabat M, Torabizadeh K, Fathi S, Ebrahimi Balil F. Evaluation of doctoral nursing program (application of CIPP model). Journal of Ardabil Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. 2011; 12: 44-51.
  7. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. (2022). from: http://www.jhsph.edu/departments/population-family-and reproductivehealth/degreeprograms/phd/index.htm
  8. Holley K. The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education. 2009; 58(2): 241-55.
  9. The Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Knowledge translation strategy 2004—2009: Innovation in action. retrieved 26 Sep 2014, from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/26574.html
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 13, Issue 3
September 2023
Pages 15-20

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics