The effect of using peer-teaching in teaching physiology course on the learning of medical students and their satisfaction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Medical education, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.22038/fmej.2023.69653.1519

Abstract

Background: Education through peer-teachers is one of the teaching-learning methods that is being increasingly used in various studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of peer-teachers in teaching physiology on learning and satisfaction of medical students.
Method: This semi-experimental study was conducted on medical students of the basic sciences in Mashhad Medical School in 2021-2022. Students were divided into two groups: conventional and Peer teaching methods. The average score of the quizzes at the beginning and end of each session, final exam score, and rate of information retention were compared between the two groups. A survey was also conducted among students to assess their satisfaction.
Results: The mean scores of the quizzes in the peer-teaching group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the final exam score. In the PT group, the greatest improvement in grades was in students with GPA above 17 compared to students with GPA between 14 and 17 and GPA less than 14, but in the control group, there was no significant difference between students with different GPAs. Examining the rate of data retention showed that the students in the peer-teaching group had a higher score than the control group. 83% of students were highly satisfied with this teaching method.
Conclusion: The use of peer-teaching method improved motivation among medical students and increase their learning process, in addition to creating satisfaction among them.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Motevasselian M NK. The comparison effect of CD-ROM & demonstration method of measuring of vital sing skills in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;3(2):41-7. Persian.
  2. Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery . Teaching through Near-Peer Method in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2016;16(42):366-78. Persian.
  3. Williams B RP. Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;42:23-9.
  4. Henning JM WT, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: Literature review. Athletic Training Education journal 2008;3(3):84-90.
  5. DT S. Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: condition and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1064-70.
  6. Durning SJ, ten Cate OT. Peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):523-4.
  7. Naeger DM, Conrad M, Nguyen J, Kohi MP, Webb EM. Students teaching students: evaluation of a "near-peer" teaching experience. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(9):1177-82.
  8. Stenberg M CE. Swedish student nurses’ perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting—an evaluation study. . BMC Nurs. 2015;14(1):48.
  9. Krista Rompolski MD. The Benefits of Near-Peer Teaching Assistants in the Anatomy and Physiology Lab: An Instructor and a Student’s Perspective on a Novel Experience. Journal of the Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. 2020;24(1):82-94.
  10. Safari M YB, Mahmoudi F, Yaghobean N. Comparing Students’ Rate of Learning through Lecturing and Peer Group Teaching and Study Their Viewpoints. Research in Medical Education. 2018;10(3):24-34. Persian.
  11. Seyed Majidi M JR. Evaluation Attitudes of Clinical Medicine and Basic Sciences Teachers about Peer-Assisted Learning in Babol University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2014;7(1):13-7. Persian.
  12. John D. Christensen NAS, Lucky Challyandra, M. Elena Stark. Establishment of a Peer Teaching Assistant Program for Preclinical Human Gross Anatomy Curricula. Medical Science Educator. 2018;28:765–72.
  13. Joseph B. House CHC, Heather L. Wourman, Kristin M. Berg, Jonathan P. Fischer, Sally A. Santen Efficient and Effective Use of Peer Teaching for Medical Student Simulation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;1:137-41.
  14. Marijke Avonts NRM, Katrien Bombeke, Niel Hens, Samuel Coenen, Olivier M. Vanderveken, Benedicte Y. De Winter. Does peer teaching improve academic results and competencies during medical school? A mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22:431.
  15. Hughes TC JZ, Lally K, Lloyd-Lavery A, Lota A, Dale A. Advanced Cardiac Resuscitation Evaluation (ACRE): A randomised single-blind controlled trial of peer-led vs. expert-led advanced resuscitation training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010;18(1):3.
  16. Indah S. Widyahening AF, Respati W. Ranakusuma, Esthika Dewiasty, Kuntjoro Harimurti. Evaluation of the role of near-peer teaching in critical appraisal skills learning: a randomized crossover trial. International Journal of Medical Education. 2019;10:9-15.
  17. Williams B RP. Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;42:23-9.
  18. Hodgson Y BM, Schneider-Kolsky M. Lessons Learned in Implementing Peer Assisted Learning. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2012;20(3):19-30.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 13, Issue 3
September 2023
Pages 3-9

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics