Telemedicine Education Amidst COVID-19: Review of Literature and Call to Action

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro Arkansas, USA

Abstract

Background: In the presence of COVID-19, telemedicine is being utilized to limit person-to person spread. Unfortunately, despite this increase in utilization, the amount of training provided to healthcare professionals has not increased with it creating a gap between user and machine.  To combat this problem, the American Medical Association has called for an increase in formalized training for telemedicine. The purpose of this literature review is to provide more recent examples of telemedicine education techniques in order to close this training gap and give providers the tools they need to succeed in the new COVID-19 world.
Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective literature review in the United States during April through June of 2020 by searching the PubMed (MEDLINE) database for publications pertaining to telemedicine education and training. After review, 10 pieces of literature were analyzed for methods and skills taught in telemedicine, means to assess competency as well as future directions. 
Results: This study identified a broad scope of skills to be taught from orientation to technology, to patient interaction methods, as well as the current medico-legal guidelines. Using standardized assessments and being supervised by trained physicians, there is a role for telemedicine to be incorporated into formal curricula.
Conclusions: While it is accepted that telemedicine increases access to care, this does not translate to an increase in quality of care. One of the ways to close that gap is by optimizing training. This work provides examples of how telemedicine can be incorporated across all healthcare disciplines. 

Keywords


  1. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1679-81. March 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2003539
  2. Hong Y-R, Lawrence J, Jr DW, Iii AM. Population-Level Interest and Telehealth Capacity of US Hospitals in Response to COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Google Search and National Hospital Survey Data. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e18961. doi:10.2196/18961
  3. Lee I, Kovarik C, Tejasvi T, Pizarro M, Lipoff JB. Telehealth: Helping Your Patients andPractice Survive and Thrive During the COVID-19 Crisis with Rapid Quality Implementation. J Am Acad Dermatol. March 2020:S0190962220304722. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.052
  4. Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: A review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):273-82. doi:10.1177/1357633X16632968
  5. Moore MA, Coffman M, Jetty A, Klink K, Petterson S, Bazemore A. Family Physicians Report Considerable Interest in, but Limited Use of, Telehealth Services. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(3):320-30. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160201
  6. AMA encourages telemedicine training for medical students, residents. American Medical Association. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama encourages-telemedicine-training-medical-students-residents. Accessed April 10, 2020.
  7. Pathipati AS, Azad TD, Jethwani K. Telemedical Education: Training Digital Natives in Telemedicine. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(7):e193. doi:10.2196/jmir.5534
  8. Sartori DJ, Olsen S, Weinshel E, Zabar SR. Preparing trainees for telemedicine: a virtual OSCE pilot. Med Educ. 2019;53(5):517-18. doi:10.1111/medu.13851
  9. Lee MS, Nambudiri V. Integrating Telemedicine Into Training: Adding Value to Graduate Medical Education Through Electronic Consultations. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(3):251-54. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00754.1
  10. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4-12. doi:10.1177/1357633X16674087
  11. Afshari M, Witek NP, Galifianakis NB. Education Research: An experiential outpatient teleneurology curriculum for residents. Neurology. 2019;93(4):170-75.

doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007848

  1. Govindarajan R, Anderson ER, Hesselbrock RR, et al. Developing an outline for teleneurology curriculum. Neurology. 2017;89(9):951-59.

doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004285

  1. Jagolino AL, Jia J, Gildersleeve K, et al. A call for formal telemedicine training during stroke fellowship. Neurology. 2016;86(19):1827-33.

doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002568

  1. Rienits H, Teuss G, Bonney A. Teaching telehealth consultation skills. Clin Teach. 2016;13(2):119-23. doi:10.1111/tct.12378
  2. Teichert E. At the “webside.” Mod Healthc. 2016;46(35):16-18.
  3. Hilty DM, Crawford A, Teshima J, Chan S, Sunderji N, Yellowkees PM, et al. A framework for telepsychiatric training and e health: Competency-based education, evaluation and implications. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):569-92. doi:10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292
  4. Martínez-Pérez B, de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M, Sainz-De-Abajo B. Comparison of Mobile Apps for the Leading Causes of Death Among Different Income Zones: A Review of the Literature and App Stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(1). doi:10.2196/mhealth.2779