Socioeconomic background of students in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences: A comparative study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 School of Medical Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Department of Community Medicine & Public Health, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Various factors have been found to affect the medicine study and academic performance of medical students, among which the socioeconomic factors seem to have a major role in applicants’ success when they enter medical schools. The purpose of this study was to investigate the socioeconomic status of medical students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and to compare it with those of surgical technology, occupational health, and environmental health students.
Methods: Data regarding demographic characteristics, parental education, occupation, income, number of siblings, marital status, and schooling of students were collected by using a questionnaire. Moreover, some data were checked with Students’ Electronic Database of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Results: Medical students have better socioeconomic status than other students (p=0.029). Specifically, they have more educated parents (p≤0.05) with more professional jobs (p<0.039), have fewer siblings (p=0.006) and encounter less economic challenges (p<0.0001). In addition, during their high school education, medical students attended more fee-paying schools than state schools (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: There are obvious socioeconomic differences between medical students and other students in this study. To decrease the inequalities in medical schools, it is important to address socioeconomic issues when considering potential applicants for medical education.

Keywords

References

1. Fan AP, Chen CH, Su TP, Shih WJ, Lee CH, Hou SM. The association between parental socioeconomic status (SES) and medical students' personal and professional development. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2007;36(9):735-42.
2. Eslami Y, Amini H, Zarei R, Fakhraie G, Moghimi S, Mohammadi SF, et al. Socioeconomic Factors and Disease Severity at Glaucoma Presentation. . Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;23(2):19 - 26.
3. Garmarudi G, Moradi A. Development of a tool to measure socioeconomic status in Tehran. Payesh. 2010; 9 (2): 137-144. Persian.
4. Sprinthall E. Educational Psychology. A Development Approach. 2nd Edition. New York: Addeson Wesley; 1987.
5. Karalliedde LD, Premadasa IG. Socio-economic status and aspirations of Third World medical entrants: a Sri Lankan study. Med Teach. 1988;10(1):101-4.
6. Dhalla IA, Kwong JC, Streiner DL, Baddour RE, Waddell AE, Johnson IL. Characteristics of first-year students in Canadian medical schools. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2002;166(8):1029-35.
7. Heath C, Stoddart C, Green H. Parental backgrounds of Otago medical students. The New Zealand medical journal. 2002;115(1165):U237.
8. Fitzjohn J, Wilkinson T, Gill D, Mulder R. The demographic characteristics of New Zealand medical students: the New Zealand Wellbeing, Intentions, Debt and Experiences (WIDE) Survey of Medical Students 2001 study. The New Zealand medical journal. 2003;116(1183):U626.
9. Woo JK, Ghorayeb SH, Lee CK, Sangha H, Richter S. Effect of patient socioeconomic status on perceptions of first- and second-year medical students. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2004;170(13):1915-9.
10. Kwong JC, Dhalla IA, Streiner DL, Baddour RE, Waddell AE, Johnson IL. A comparison of Canadian medical students from rural and non-rural backgrounds. Canadian journal of rural medicine : the official journal of the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada = Journal canadien de la medecine rurale : le journal officiel de la Societe de medecine rurale du Canada. 2005;10(1):36-42.
11. Hensel JM, Shandling M, Redelmeier DA. Rural medical students at urban medical schools: Too few and far between? Open Med. 2007;1(1):e13-7.
12. Yinusa MA, Basil AO. Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Students Academic Performance in Nigeria: Some Explanation from a Local Survey. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences. 2008;5(4):319 - 23.
13. Ferguson E, James D, Yates J, Lawrence C. Predicting who applies to study medicine: implication for diversity in UK medical schools. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):382-91.
14. Kumwenda B, Cleland J, Greatrix R, MacKenzie RK, Prescott G. Are efforts to attract graduate applicants to UK medical schools effective in increasing the participation of under-represented socioeconomic groups? A national cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018946.
15. Kumwenda B, Cleland JA, Prescott GJ, Walker K, Johnston PW. Relationship between sociodemographic factors and selection into UK postgraduate medical training programmes: a national cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021329.
16. Terregino CA1, Saguil A, Price-Johnson T, Anachebe NF, Goodell K. The Diversity and Success of Medical School Applicants with Scores in the Middle Third of the MCAT Score Scale. Acad Med. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002941.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 9, Issue 4
Winter
December 2019
Pages 64-69

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics