The compatibility of the new undergraduate nursing curriculum with occupational needs from the viewpoint of the faculty members of some north and north-west Universities of Medical Sciences of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 BSc Student, Department of Nursing, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran

2 Health Education Department, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

3 Medical-Surgical Department, Ardabil University Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

4 Medical-Surgical Department, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran

5 Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

6 Medical-Surgical Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Background: Nursing education is part of the higher education system that deals with human life and considering its quantitative and qualitative aspects is very important. Understanding educational needs is a prerequisite for successful education. This study is aims is to investigate the compatibility of nursing undergraduate curriculum with occupational needs from the viewpoints of faculty members of some north and north-west universities of medical sciences of Iran.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted with the participation of 61 nursing faculty members of Ardebil, Urmia, Zanjan, Tabriz, and Rasht Universities of Medical Sciences in the fall of 2017 using the census method. A checklist containing the curriculum of undergraduate nursing based on the approved headings of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education was used. Data were analyzed by SPSS software.
Results: The findings of this study showed that the highest compatibly with job requirements from the viewpoint of faculty members based on the checklist scores from 1 to 4 was related to biochemistry with a mean and standard deviation of 2.1 ± 1.03, among specific courses, epidemiology with mean and standard deviation of 1.90 ± 0.99, and among internship and field apprenticeship, adult and elderly internships with mean and standard deviation of 1.51 ± 0.03.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the curriculum developed for the undergraduate nursing degree is not suitable for nursing job requirements and needs modifications in some aspects. Therefore, presenting the results of this study can be used developing and modification of the undergraduate nursing curriculum based on occupational needs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Ebadi A, Vanaki Z, Nahrir B, Hekmatpou D. Pathology of continuing educational programs in Iran medical society. Stride in Development of Medical Education 2008; 4(2): 140-5. Persian.
  2. Ghahrman Tabrizi K, Tondnevis F, Amirtash A, Kadivar P. Relationship between organizational culture and creativity of faculty members in physical education groups at Iranian state universities. Journal of Motion Sciences and Sport 2005; 6(1):139–50. Persian.
  3. Allen DL, Caffesse RG, Bornerand M, Frame JW, Heyboer A. Participatory continuing dental education. Int Dent J. 1994; 44(5): 511-19.
  4. Dagenais ME, Hawley D, Lund JP.  Assessing the effectiveness of a new curriculum: Part I. J Dent Educ. 2003; 67(1):54-47.
  5. Doglas L. The effective nurse: leader and manager. Nikshokrnia F, translator. Tehran: Boshra publication; 1996.
  6. Dehghan Nayeri N, Nazari AA, Salsali M, Ahmadi F, Adib Hajbaghery M. Iranian staff nurses’ views of their productivity and management factors improving and impeding it: a qualitative study.  Nurs Health Sci. 2006; 8(1):51-6.
  7. Azizi F. Medical education: mission, vision and challenges. 1st ed. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education. 2003: 186-200. Persian.
  8. Abdolahyan M. Methods of teaching and learning in nursing education. Babel Medical Publishing; 2003. Persian.
  9. Bourbannais FF, Langford S, Giannantoni L. Development of a clinical evaluation toolfor baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008; 8(1): 62-71.
  10. Elcigil A, Yildirim Sari H. Determining problems experienced by student nurses in their work with clinical educators in Turkey. Nurse Educ Today 2007; 27(5): 491-8.
  11. Hadizadeh F, Firoozi M, Shamaeyan Razavi N. Nursing and midwifery students’ perspective on clinical education in Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2005; 5 (1):70-78. Persian.
  12. Nikbakht AR, Lipson JG, Emami A. Professional nursing in Iran: an overview of its historical and Socio cultural framework. J Prof Nurs. 2004; 20(6): 396-402.
  13. Adib Hajbaghery M, Salsali M. A model for empowerment of nursing in Iran. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005; 5(24): 2-11.
  14. Sohrabi S, Deris F, Hashemi SM. Causes for uselessness of theoretical instructions in patients bedsides: investigation of nurses and Midwives viewpoints. Research in Medical Sciences 1998; 3(1): 71-3. Persian.
  15. Salehi SH, Tavakol z, Hasanzahraie R, Bashardost N, Mahjur SR. The performance evaluation of BS nursing graduates based on their own perspectives and their head nurses in the hospital affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2002. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2002; 4: 44-55. Persian.
  16. Abdolahzadeh F, Niknam F, Alizadeh M. Determining the most influential factors in educational planning from the perspective of students. Special Supplement for 8th National Congress of Medical Education .Kerman. 2007; March 6-8:232. Persian.
  17. Toulabi T, Janani F, Qurbanmohammadi E. The appropriateness of educational programs' objectives for professional needs: The viewpoints of Khorramabad School of Nursing and Midwifery graduates. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2009; 8(2): 263-73. Persian.
  18. Arefi M. Strategic curriculum in higher education. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2005. Persian.
  19. Jahangiri L, Mucciolo TW, Choi M, Spielman AI. Assessment of teaching effectiveness inU .S. Dental schools and the value of triangulation. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72(6):707-18.
  20. Farahani M, Ahmadi F. Doctoral nursing students’ viewpoints about the nursing PhD curriculum. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2006; 6(1): 83-92. Persian.
  21. Mirzabeigi Gh, Sanjari M, Shirazi F, Heidari Sh, Salemi S. Nursing students' and educators' views about nursing education in Iran. Nursing Research 2011; 6(20):68-74.
  22. Bouzarjomehri F, Nafisi Moghadam R. Attitude of medical students of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences towards change in the medical physics curriculum. Journal of Medical Education and Development 2012; 7 (3):58-66. Persian.
  23. Nouhi E, Kohan S, Haghdoost A, Nazari R. Theoretical nursing courses application in clinical field: clinical nurse teachers & students perspectives in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences . Iran Journal of Nursing. 2007; 20(52):29-38. Persian.
    1. Way M, Macneil M. Baccalaureate entry to practice: A system view. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007; 38(4):164-9.
  24. Borzou R, Safari M, Khodavisi M, Torkaman B. The viewpoints of nurses towards applicability of nursing curriculum in hospitals affiliated to Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2009; 8(2):205-11. Persian.
  25. Babamohammadi H, Khalili H. Critical thinking skills of nursing students in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2004; 4(2): 23-31. Persian.
  26.  Adib Hajbagheri M, Salsali M, Ahmadi F. Clinical decision-making: a way to professional empowerment in nursing. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2003; 3(2): 21-5. Persian.
  27. Wagner EH, Reid RJ. Are continuity of care and teamwork incompatible? Med Care 2007;45(1): 6-7.
  28. Brazil K, Howell D, Marshall D, Critchley P, Van den Elzen P, Thomson C. Building primary care capacity in palliative care: proceedings of an interprofessional workshop. J Palliat Care. 2007; 23(2):113-16.
  29. Bégat I, Ellefsen B, Severinsson E. Nurses' satisfaction with their work environment and the outcomes of clinical nursing supervision on nurses' experiences of well-being: a Norwegian study. J Nurs Manag. 2005 May; 13(3): 221-30.
  30. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004 Feb; 24(2):105-12.
  31. Biabangardi Z, Parsa S, Haji Kazemi E, Khanjari S, Shahpurian F, Mashayekh F. Program evaluation of nursing educational opinions of graduates and undergraduates. Research in Medical Sciences 1998; 3(1): 28- 32. Persian.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Winter
December 2018
Pages 39-45

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics