Content analysis of educational assistants views regarding the evaluation of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences’ professors in educational clinical departments: a qualitative study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of educational development, School of medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of social medicine, School of medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of pathology , School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Instructors play an instrumental role in education, particularly in medical sciences where they are regarded as the most influential factor in the process of education. The present study was carried out with the aim of demonstrating assistants’ views about professors’ teaching in Mashhad School of Medicine.
Methods: The current study is a qualitative analysis in which the written views of 639 assistants in Mashhad School of Medicine was studied. Data was analyzed using the summative content analysis method.
Results: The themes that appeared in this study include professional qualification and personal features. Professional qualifications included command of knowledge, interest and practical skill. The theme of personal features included personality traits and ethical behavior.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it can be seen that while teaching, every behavior and aspect of an instructor is observed by assistants; which plays an important role in the training of the assistants. Thus, in addition to an instructor’s knowledge and practical skills, which are important in their own right, their views and behavioral and personality traits are also influential as models for their assistants and will influence their lifestyle in their professional life in the future.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Bastani P, Amini M, Tahernejad A, Rouhollahi N. The Tehran University of Medical Sciences faculty members’ viewpoints about the teachers’ evaluation system: a qualitative study. Quarterly Journal of Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences 2014;2(1):7-16. Persian.
  2. Seldin P. The use and abuse of student rating of professor. Chron High Educ. 1993; 39:40.
  3. Fink LD. Evaluating your own teaching. In: Seldin P, editor. Improving college teaching. 1st ed. Bolton. Jossey-Bass; 1995.
  4. Dehghani M, Nakhaee N. Teacher evaluating by the students: a review on criticisms. Development Steps in Medical Education 2012; 9(2):102-9. Persian.
  5. Ministry of Health. Executive order for the promotion of faculty members of universities and higher education institutions in the medical sciences universities of the Islamic Republic of Iran [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Apr 12]. Available from:http://aac.behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx?siteid=179&fkeyid=&siteid=113&pageid=10063
  6. Iman M, Noushadi M. Qualitative content analysis. Pazhuhesh 2011-12:3(2):15-44. Persian.
  7. Sharifnia H, Ebadi A, Afshar M. Good professor features from students and nursing teachers' perspectives, a qualitative study. Quarterly Journal of Health Breeze 2013;2(1):1-10. Persian.
  8. Cheraghi M, Ghiasvand Sh, Esmaeili M. Features of prominent professor, a qualitative study. Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty 2013;12(2):86-93. Persian.
  9. Jang S, Guan S, Hsieh H. Developing and instrument for assessing college student's perceptions of teacher's pedagogical content knowledge. Proc Soc Beh Sci. 2009; 1:596-606.
  10. Salmeh F, Yaghobi T, Yaghobian M. The characteristics of effective professors from nursing student's perspective. Iranian J Med Edu. 2003;3(10):26-30.Persian.
  11. Elahi N, Alhani F, Ahmadi F. Iranian nursing instructors’ perceived experiences of challenges of effective education: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of Qualitative Researching Health Sciences 2012;1(3):229-39.Persian.
  12. Barton Aj, Armstrong G, Preheim G, Gelmon SB, Andrus LC. A national Delphi to determine developmental progression of quality and safety competencies in nursing education. Nurse Outlook 2009; 57(6):313-22.
  13. Bradshaw A. Defining 'Competency' in nursing: an analytical review. J Cline Nurse 1998; 7(2):103-11.
  14. Melrose S, Miller J, Gordon K, Janzen KJ. Becoming socialized into a new professional role: Lpn to Bn student nurses' experiences with legitimation. Nurse Res Pract 2012; 34(6):78-81.
  15. Ember D, Ho A, Hong C. Characterizing a teaching and learning environment capable of motivating student learning. Learn Environ Res. 2010;13(1):43-57.
  16. Larson C. Teaching effectiveness: a principal’s view. The Agricultural Education Magazine 2005; 65(3):12-13.
  17. Luft VD, Thompson GW. Factors contributing to the effectiveness of agricultural education teachers: what students say? The Agricultural Education Magazine 1995; 68(3):23-4.
  18. Lockaby J, Vaughn P. Teaching values in agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education 1999; 40(1):74-81.
  19. Dargahi H, Hamouzadeh P, Sadeghifar J, Raadabadi M, Roshani M, Salimi M, Soltanzadeh P. Criteria assessment of an expert teacher for effective teaching. Journal of Payavard Salamat 2011; 4(3,4):91-8. Persian.
  20. Sahenk S. Characteristics of the headmasters, teachers and students in an effective school. J Med Edu. 2010; 19(2):4299-304.
  21. Little M, Kobak R. Emotional security with teachers and children’s stress reactivity: A comparison of special education and regular classrooms. J Clin Child Adol Psycho. 2003; 32:127-38.
  22. Silver R, Measelle J, Amstrong J, Essex M. Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior. J sch psych. 2005; 43:39-50.
  23. Zhang L. From conceptions of effective teachers to styles of teaching: Imp for High Edu. 2009; 19:113-18.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Winter
December 2018
Pages 3-7

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics