Gardner’s Multiple-Intelligences Profile and Its Relationship with Academic Performance (Students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences/Academic Year 2014-2015)

Document Type : Original Article


1 Instructor, Department of Education, Payame Noor University, Iran.

2 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.


Background: Gardner’s Multiple-Intelligences profile can serve as a powerful instrument for assessment of learners' abilities and aptitudes. The present study aimed to obtain the Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences profile of students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUOMS) in the academic year 2014-2015 and examine its relationship with their academic performance.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-correlational study was conducted on medical, nursing and midwifery students of TUOMS in the academic year 2014-2015. Data was collected by administering Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Developmental Assessment Scales to 150 subjects selected by non-probability convenience sampling. Academic performance of students was evaluated by their average grades. Data was analyzed by SPSS19 using multiple regression.
Results: Medical students scored highest in existential intelligence (18.42 ± 4.67) and intrapersonal intelligence (16.74 ± 4.15) and scored lowest in musical intelligence (12.54 ± 3.99) and bodily intelligence (13.66 ± 4.46). Regression analysis showed that verbal intelligence (P= 0.004, β = 0.392) and existential intelligence (P= 0.014, β = -0.327) were the only Gardner intelligence components that can explain the students' academic performance with statistical significance.
Conclusion: The results showed that among Gardner’s Multiple-Intelligences, existential, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and verbal intelligence contribute the most to the selection of medical sciences as the path of education, and that verbal intelligence is associated with academic success. The results of this study can be employed as an applied knowledge to improve the quality of education counseling to be provided for future medical students.


Main Subjects


Intelligence is one of the most significant factors of human adaptation to environment and thus how different individuals react to the method of education (1). The concept of intelligence has gone through an evolution from a monolithic concept to a multidimensional one (2). In this context, Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory has opened new horizons for researchers to understand human intelligence and its relation with the efficacy of education process. As such, this theory can have significant effects on evaluation of learning process and academic performance (3).

Gardner believes that intelligence is “the capacity to solve problems or to fashion products that are valued in one or more cultural setting” (4). The basic concept of his theory is that people could be intelligent in more than one way. Since birth, people may develop a variety of particular talents and can be stronger in one or more aspects of intelligence and less so in others (5).

One of Gardner's intelligence dimensions is the interpersonal intelligence. According to Gardner, interpersonal intelligence allows the person to communicate with others. Typically, teachers, university professors, politicians, religious leaders, therapists, traders, and salesmen rely on interpersonal intelligence for their work (4).

Another dimension of Gardner's intelligence theory is the intrapersonal intelligence. This intelligence reinforces a person’s ability to know himself, become aware of his inner feelings, dreams and desires, to understand his role in relationships with others, and to discover his strengths and weaknesses. Researchers, theorists, and philosophers need to have a high level of intrapersonal intelligence (6). People with naturalist intelligence are able to classify and identify different subjects based on their similarities and differences including visible and latent capacities and features. Gardner believes that scientists, poets, artists, social scientists, hunters, farmers, and gardeners receive a high score in this dimension of intelligence (7). The existential intelligence allows people to raise profound questions about life, death, and their role in the world. This intelligence is associated with the fields of philosophy, religion, and aesthetics, and usually philosophers, religious leaders, artists and architects receive a high score in this intelligence (8). People with high verbal/linguistic intelligence are able to use their verbal and written language and vocabulary more sensibly. Teachers and university professors, writers, lawyers, religious leaders, poets, journalists and translators often receive a high score in this intelligence (9). The logical/mathematical intelligence allows people to use reasoning, logic and numbers more effectively and to think conceptually with the help of numerical and logical patterns. People with high logical/mathematical intelligence are good at dividing and classifying information, working with abstract concepts and understanding their relationship with each other, using or following a long chain of arguments, planning and conducting controlled experiments, enquiring about natural phenomena, performing complex mathematical calculations, and working with geometric shapes. Scientists, researchers, engineers, computer programmers, mathematicians, and accountants need a high level of this intelligence (10). The bodily/Kinetic intelligence is another aspect of Gardner's theory. This intelligence allows people to effectively control their body movements, use objects, maintain a good sense of balance, and achieve better hand-eye coordination. This intelligence is important for dancing, physical fitness, exercise, using body language, handcrafting, acting, imitation, use of hands to make or create things, and in expressing feelings through body language (4). People with high level of this intelligence are able to produce and understand music, and can think through sounds, rhythms and musical patterns. They react to music immediately, either by admiration or by criticism. Musicians, composers and singers strongly rely on this particular intelligence (6, 10). The visual/spatial intelligence refers to the ability to understand visual phenomena. People with high visual/spatial intelligence are good at making puzzles, reading, writing, understanding graphs and shapes, they have a good sense of direction. Sailors, engineers, mechanics, architects, inventors, sculptors, and interior designers benefit from this intelligence in their work (8).

Since the choice of academic discipline is one of the critical issues of education system, has profound social, political and cultural dimensions, and is the basis for success or failure to provide high-quality labor with right academic and psychological skills for the occupations required by nation, high school and college students need to be provided with proper, efficient, up-to-date, and compassionate educational counseling equipped with latest learning and assessment tools so as to ensure the quality of future human resources. One of the most important variables associated with the choice of academic discipline and future occupational skills of students is their ability in each category of intelligence as described by theorists such as Gardner. Review of prior studies indicates that given the wide variety of theoretical views regarding the constituent components of intelligence, intelligence cannot be considered as a reliable predictor of academic performance, but it cannot be ignored either. For example, studies of many researchers have proven the undeniable role of intelligence in academic performance (11-14). But other studies such as the one conducted by Neisser et al. reports that intelligences are not a good predictor of academic performance (15). A research by McMahon and Rose has shown that students who receive high scores in Gardner's logical intelligence are more successful in reading comprehension (7). Snyder has also shown that talent of students in this area leads to an improved academic performance (16).

Review of the related research literature shows that only a few studies have been dedicated to this particular subject, and interestingly their results have been partially inconsistent. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the Gardner's multiple-intelligences profile of students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUOMS) during the academic year 2014-2015 and examine its relationship with their academic performance.

Materials and Methods

 Design, setting and participants

This cross-sectional descriptive-correlational study was conducted on 150 medical, nursing and midwifery students of TUOMS during the second semester of the academic year 2014-2015. The sample size (n=150) was calculated for a population size of 500 people using the sample size formula with 95% confidence level and permissible error of 8%.  Then
for each of the fields (medical, nursing and midwifery), a sample size proportional to size was calculated.

The inclusion criteria were informed consent of participants and progression to at least the second year of education. The exclusion criterion was the failure to fill the questionnaire in full. Subjects were selected by non-probability convenience sampling. For this purpose, after preparing the questionnaires and coordination with university staff, the students residing in the university dormitory were briefed about the study and then questionnaires were distributed among those who were willing to participate. In the briefing, the purpose of the study was explained and students were ensured about the confidentiality of their identity and inputs. Participants were asked to carefully read the entire questionnaires, answer all questions, and ask researchers to clarify possible ambiguities.

Measures and data collection

Academic performance of students was evaluated by their average grades. Gardner's intelligence dimensions profile of students at TUOMS was obtained by Multiple Intelligences Developmental Assessment Scales (MIDAS) questionnaire. This questionnaire has been designed by Hurmoz and Dogas and has been translated into Persian by Hosseini. This questionnaire, which has 45 questions devised based on six-item Likert scale, measures the intelligences of respondent as defined by Gardner's multiple intelligence theory. In this questionnaire, each of the 9 intelligence components is measured by 5 questions; more specifically, musical intelligence is measured by questions 1 to 5, bodily intelligence by questions 6 to 10, visual intelligence by questions 11 to 15, logical intelligence by questions 16 to 20, verbal intelligence by questions 21 to 25, interpersonal intelligence by questions 26 to 30, intrapersonal intelligence by questions  31 to 35, naturalist intelligence by questions 36 to 40 , and existential intelligence by questions 41 to 45.

Validity and reliability of this questionnaire have been confirmed in several studies. A study by Pishghadam and Moafyan has reported a reliability of 0.78-0.89 for the questionnaire subscales and a reliability of 0.93 for the entire questionnaire (17). A study by Mostaphapoor has also reported a total reliability of 76% for this questionnaire (18). In the present study, reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, and was calculated to 0.692 for musical intelligence, 0.614 for bodily intelligence, 0.666 for visual intelligence, 0.536 for logical intelligence, 0.530 for verbal intelligence, 0.772 for interpersonal intelligence, 0.704 for intrapersonal intelligence, 0.755 for naturalist intelligence, 0.752 for existential intelligence, 0.897 for the entire questionnaire.

Statistical analyses

Collected data was analyzed in SPSS19 using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multiple regression analysis) to determine whether academic performance can be predicted by Gardner's intelligence dimensions.



In this study, 118 (78.5%) of the students were female and 32 (21.5%) of students were male. Respondents aged between 18 to 42 years old. Other demographic specifications of the subjects are presented in Table 1. Distribution of Gardner's intelligence dimensions among TUOMS students showed that, on average, medical students score highest in the existential, intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical and bodily intelligences, nursing students score highest in the existential, intrapersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical and bodily intelligences, and midwifery students score highest in the existential, verbal, naturalist, intrapersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical intelligence. With the effect of academic discipline excluded, TUOMS students score highest in the existential and intrapersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical and bodily intelligences (Table 1).

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of study variables*












Academic performance





Musical intelligence





Bodily intelligence





Visual intelligence





Logical intelligence





Verbal intelligence





Interpersonal intelligence





Intrapersonal intelligence





Naturalist intelligence





Existential intelligence





*All data are presented as Mean ± standard deviation


Table 2 shows the results of simultaneous multiple regression analysis of relation between academic performance and Gardner's intelligence dimensions. According to the results, Gardner's intelligence components account for 15 percent of variance in students' academic performance, and the verbal intelligence (P= 0.004, β = 0.392) and the existential intelligence (P= 0.014, β = -0.327) are the only intelligence components that can explain the students' academic performance with statistical significance.


Table 2. Results of simultaneous multiple regression analysis



standardized coefficients

unstandardized coefficients



Predictor variable






















Musical intelligence






Bodily intelligence






Visual intelligence






Logical intelligence






Verbal intelligence






Interpersonal intelligence






Intrapersonal intelligence






Naturalist intelligence






Existential intelligence


This study aimed to determine the Gardner's MI profile of TUOMS students and its relationship with their academic performance. Distribution of Gardner's intelligence dimensions showed that excluding the effect of academic discipline, TUOMS students score highest in the existential, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and verbal intelligences and score lowest in the musical and bodily intelligences. The results also showed that on average, medical students score highest in the existential, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and verbal intelligences and score lowest in the musical and bodily intelligences, nursing students score highest in the existential, intrapersonal, and interpersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical intelligence, and midwifery students score highest in the existential, verbal, interpersonal, and intrapersonal intelligences and score lowest in the musical intelligence. These results are consistent with the findings of Ansari et al, Lobo et al, Gonzalez et al. regarding the distribution of Gardner’s intelligence dimensions among medical students (5, 11, 12, 19). These results are also consistent with the report of Martinez on how medical students score high in intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences but not with his report on high scores of these students in musical and bodily intelligences (13).

The second objective of this study was to determine whether any of the intelligence scores can predict the academic performance. According to the results of multiple regression analysis, verbal and existential intelligences are both significant predictors of academic performance. However, while verbal intelligence predicts the academic performance positively (with direct association), existential intelligence does so negatively (with inverse association). The significant positive association between verbal intelligence and academic performance has also been reported in some studies which have reported that students who had high scores in Gardner's verbal intelligence had a better academic performance. However, our results regarding the inverse association of existential intelligence with academic performance are inconsistent with the aforementioned studies. This inconsistency can be theoretically explained by the reports of Martin and Gardner (20, 21). In traditional education systems such as Iran’s, many dimensions of intelligence are generally ignored, so only the students who have high logical and verbal intelligences can excel in their education. In fact, such systems ignore that every student, whether in college or high school, can be seen as a unique prism with a range of intelligences like a color spectrum. Each prism decomposes the sunlight, which unlike its appearance is composed of different colors, into a unique color spectrum, containing not only the visible and distinct colors but also UV and infrared rays that are invisible to the eye. Some people consider general intelligence as the sunlight, that is, a monolithic concept that can be either weak or strong. But Gardner's theory argues that each person, like a prism, can turn the seemingly monolithic general intelligence into a unique spectrum of intelligences of different types. Sometimes these intelligences are perceptible and obvious, but sometimes they are latent and need to be discovering an explored. It is therefore necessary to provide a set of diverse and yet coherent educational approaches to allow all students express and exploit their own type of intelligence in the course of education. Education system (including primary, secondary, and higher education) should accept and acknowledge the presence of multiple differentiable intelligences in students and provide equal opportunities and facilities for all students with all aspects of intelligence instead of focusing on one or two most visible dimensions of intelligence and effectively undermining the chance of realization of any alternative potential. Attention to students’ individual abilities and to the fact that these abilities cannot be measured by a simple test at a limited time can be a start for the support of all students and acknowledgment of their abilities and talents, and thus help them cultivate and exploit these features as a means to progress and success in their education and occupational life (22).

Limitations of the present study include failure to use a random sampling method and limiting the sample population to dormitory students of only three academic disciplines, which undermine the generalizability and external validity of the results. The future studies are recommended to consider random sampling and to include in their investigations the students who reside both in and out of dormitory, students of other disciplines, and also the first-year students. Another limitation was the psychological condition of the participants that should be considered in future study designs.


The findings of this study show that Gardner's multiple intelligences play a significant role in the choice of academic discipline, and that verbal intelligence is a good predictor of student’s academic performance. In view of these results, we suggest this questionnaire to be administered nationwide to a large population of students with different academic disciplines and different levels of academic performance sorted from unsuccessful to successful in order to determine the Gardner's profiles recommended for academic success in each discipline and thus obtain a reference for counseling future students in selection of their education path.


Authors would like to thank all students who participated in the study and also the staff of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for their cooperation.

1. Hashemi V, Bahrami H, Karimi U  Relation multiple intelligences with education major and academic achievement students Journal of Psychology 2006; 10(3): 275-287 [Persian].
2. Sharifi HP Principles of psychometrics and psychological testing Tehran: roshed 2010 [Persian]   
3. Armstrong T The curriculum superhighway Journal of Educational Leadership 2007; 64(8), 16-20.
4. Gardner H The Development and Education of the Mind New York: Press Rutledge 2006.
5. Ansari1 M,  Nikneshan S, Mehri Farzaneh M Study of Predictability of Gardner's Multiple Intelligence Theory in Selecting Major between Medical and Non-Medical Sciences Students (2014) Journal of Health Policy and Sustainable Health 2014; 1(4): 125-129.
6. Loori AA Multiple intelligences: A comparative study between the preferences of males and females Social Behavior and Personality 2005; 33(1): 77-88
7. McMahon SD, Rose DS, Parks M Multiple intelligences and reading achievement: An examination of the Teele Inventory of multiple intelligences The journal of Experimental Education 2004; 73(1): 41-52
8. O'Conner RM, Little LS Revisiting the predictive validity of emotional intelligence: Self-report versus ability-based measures, Personality and Individual Differences 2003; 35 (8): 1893–1902 20-19.
9. Golman D Emotional intelligence Translate by Hamid Reza Baluchi Tehran: Jyhoon 2007 [Persian].
10. Gardner H Multiple intelligences after twenty years Paper presented at the American Educational Reseah Association, Chicago, Illinois 2003
11. Lobo Zita J, Zayat EI Sayed AFEI, Jadaan Omar AI Dominant Multiple Intelligences among Students of Medical and Health Sciences The European Conference on Education The International Academic Forum www iafororg 2014 147-156
12. González M G, Cardozo RA, Romano E, Morillo G Inteligencias Múltiples en Estudiantes de Primer año de Medicina de una Universidad Venezolana Academia Biomedica Digital Academia Biomedica Digital 2012   
13. Martínez-Sandoval G, Solís-Soto J,   Rodríguez-Pulido J, Zambrano-Margaín H Learning styles and types of multiple intelligences in dental students in their first and tenth semester Journal of Oral Research 2016; 5(3): 103-107  
14. Ayasha B, Khurshid F The relationship of multiple intelligences and effective study skills with academic achievement among university students Global Journal of Social Science Linguistics & Education 2013; 13(1): 20-32
15. Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard T, Boykin A, Brody N, Ceci S, et al Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns American Psychologist 1996; 51(2): 77−101.
16. Snyder RF The relationship between learning styles/multiple intelligences and academic achievement of high school students The High School Journal 2000; 83(2): 11-20
17. Pishghadam R, Moafyan F Multiple intelligence role in their success in teaching high school English teachers Journal of Study Foreign Languages2006 (42): 5-22 [Persian].
18. Mostaphapoor R The relationship between multiple intelligence with leisure activities Urmia city 1 area high school students in the academic year2009-2010 A dissertation proposal submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master's degree curriculum at Islamic Azad University Urmia Beranch 2010 [Persian].
19. Katzowitz EC Predominant learning styles and multiple intelligences of postsecondary allied health students  A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education 1998.
20. Gardner H Intelligence reframed New York: Basic Books 1999.
21. Martin H Multiple intelligences in the mathematics classroom Platine, IL: IRI Skylight 1998.
22. Niroo M, Haji Hossein Nejhad G, Haghani M The effect of education based on multiple intelligences in the mathematical achievement high school students’ Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration Islamic Azad University Garmsar Branch 2010; 5(2):153-168 [Persian].