Document Type : Original Article
Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences
The usual conventional method of medical education is common in most medical universities in Iran, Europe and in some medical universities in the Unites States (1). This conventional method begins with 2-3 years of basic sciences level in which normal structure and physiology of the body is taught along with clinical topics.1 In the conventional method the clinical exposure of medical students delayed to the third or fourth year of education due to the separation of pre-clinical courses from clinical courses. The late clinical exposure leads in frequent complaints about the curriculum and has become one of the effective factors in the Edinburgh Declaration 1993 (2). Medical students in Iran are also apart from the real professional work environment and their job-related responsibilities until the fourth year of education (3). Moreover, medical students’ stress, that was mostly related to first exposure to patients and performing clinical examinations for the first time, has always been the focus of attention for several years. Current data propose that early clinical exposure (ECE) can provide the opportunity for medical students to learn clinical skills by confronting and examining patients in their clinical courses. ECE, therefore, is expected to provide a dynamic learning process instead of solidly taught courses and can result in the sense of preparedness.4 ECE in the first two years of medical education has been proposed in order to increase the effectiveness of medical education. Few pieces of evidence exist on the effectiveness of this new method (3). Most of the studies performed before to evaluate the effectiveness of ECE were performed on medical students who were exposed to clinical practice accidentally or due to their part time jobs. On the other hand, these studies mostly referred to clinical skills in history taking and physical examination in the 3rd or 4th years of education. Lack of enough evidence on the attitude of medical students towards the effectiveness of ECE motivated us to perform this study on the attitudes of the 2nd and 4th semester medical students in Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.
Medical students studying in Sabzevar university of Medical Sciences were allocated to participate in this cross sectional study using a global sampling. The inclusion criterion was passing the ECE course prior to the time of study. From a total of 45 medical students, 45 students participated in this study and none of them refused filling the questionnaire. Participants were either in the 2nd or 4th semester of medical education and all of them had successfully passed the ECE course. Study instrument Data on attitudes of medical students towards ECE was collected using a validated questionnaire. This questionnaire was translated directly from English to Persian. The questionnaire contained three items including questions on the effectiveness and achievements from ECE and students intention in changing their field of study.Except for the question assessing the achievements of ECE, the rest of the questions were in Likert scale, ranging from 1 which indicated strong agreement to 5 which indicated strong disagreement. Achievements of ECE were evaluated using a multiple choice question. Students were asked to choose the achievements according to their experiences and feelings. Achievement categories included increased self confidence, valuable learning opportunity, reduced stress and anxiety and improving the attitudes towards future clinical exposures. Participants could choose more than one choice only for the question on achievements. Statistical analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to identify the frequencies. Chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between questionnaire data and gender and semester of study. The confidence interval (CI) was considered 0.95 and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 was used to analyze the data
study 14 (32.1%) were men and 31 (68.9%) were women. Amongst the 45 students 25 (55.6%) were in the 2nd semester while 20 students (44.4%) were studying in the 4th semester. Chi-square test revealed no significant difference between gender and study semester (p=0.61). All the questions were answered by the participants. Most of the students (93.3%) reported maintaining interest towards medical education as an important achievement of ECE (Table 1). Chi-square test showed a significant difference between gender and the usefulness of ECE in remembering (p=0.03) and visualization of the taught courses (p=0.02)(Table 1). There was a significant difference between study semester and the efficacy of ECE in terms of remembering taught courses (p=0.02). Second semester students agreed more with the efficacy of ECE in remembering the taught courses than the 4th semester students (p=0.02)(Table 2). Most students (77.8%) reported that they do not think of changing their field of study after passing the ECE, 29 students either strongly agreed or agreed with the statement “I do not think of fields other than medicine?”. There was no significant difference between gender (p=0.41) and study semester (p=0.53) and intention to change the field of study (Table 3 and 4). Amongst 45 participants 25 (55.6%) believed that ECE had been a good clinical experience for them. Other beliefs about ECE were: ECE resulted in a better attitude towards future clinical practice by 19 students (42.2%) and increased self confidence and reduced stress either by 18 students (40%) (Table5). No statistical test was used to compare results per gender and study semester due to the small number of subjects in each group.
Vaughan & Hogg (1995) defined attitude as, ‘A relatively enduring organization of beliefs, feelings and behavioral tendencies towards socially significant objects, groups, events or symbols or a general feeling or evaluation (positive/ negative) about some people, objects or issues.5’6 Studies indicate that attitudes have the highest chance of change during university studies (7). These attitudes can be generated for students by producing motivations and imagination of the future goals. Success and reaching goals are results of a positive attitude towards that goal or action. Various factors affect the formation and development of attitudes during life. Psychologists have studied these factors using different methods and have reached different points of views (5). In this study 93.3% of the medical students reported early clinical exposure to have an important effect on maintaining their interest to medical practice. Early clinical exposure resulted in maintaining interests toward medical courses more in the 2nd semester students than 4th semester students. Moreover, 77.8% of these students reported that they did not think about any other study fields except medicine after passing the early clinical exposure course. In this study no statistically significant difference was found between genders and study semester in the desire to convert the field of study. Among 45 participants, 25 (55.6%) believed that the early clinical exposure resulted in increased self confidence. Interest in the field of study can result in progress and improvement of the level of knowledge in students while negative attitudes can result in boredom, frustration, and lack of motivation in students (5). Early clinical exposure can facilitate medical students rapport with patients, increase their motivation and self confidence, while helping them establish their taught knowledge. In general, this course can teach medical students how to accept their role in clinical practice (4). Other studies have shown that although medical students choose this field with motivation and knowledge, their attitude and motivation decreases gradually and even becomes negative in later semesters(5). In another study by Littlewood et al. (2005) early clinical exposure was shown to result in a higher satisfaction from learned courses among medical students due to the formation of an attitude towards the physiologic and social problems of “real humans” (4). Ahmadipur et al. showed that 95.5% of medical students reported early clinical exposure to be useful in their studies while 83.3% of medical students believed that this course made a positive attitude in them so that they can enjoy their medical practice in future(7). According to Shirzad Hedayatollah et al.’s study early clinical exposure program have had positive effects on students’ self confidence which is the same as our study(8). Solomon Sathishkumar et al.’s study revealed that 60.7% of students believe that early clinical exposure is a great aid in understanding the medical physiology which is approximately the same as ours(55.6%). In comparison with Solomon Sathishkumar et al. and Vahidshahi K studies, they reported 95% of their students believe that early clinical exposure is helpful in understanding the concepts which is much more than ours. 1,9 In Johnson AK and Scott CS study 40% of students indicated that after the early clinical exposure course they were more cynical than when they had started school but our study revealed that in our students this rate is higher, approximately 64%.10 Because of different integration program among different medical schools, we cannot certainly compare our results with other studies and regarding the small body of literature in this field, this study findings suggest early clinical exposure would be effective in increasing medical students’ interest towards their field of study and helping them establish and remember their taught theoretical lessons by changing their learning process from a passive theoretical learning into a more dynamic and clinical learning.
We all wish to thank Dr. Seyed Jamal Mirmusavi and Dr. Mohammad Shouride Yazdi because of their help and support during this study. We would also thank Sabzevar University of medical science research and technology center for all of their supports.
Conflict of interest: none declared Research committee approval: This research was approved by the Sabzevar University of medical science research and technology center committee