Future of Medical Education Journal

Future of Medical Education Journal

Beyond Academic Achievement: The Impact of a Multi-Platform Flipped Classroom on Student Engagement and Satisfaction in Practical Microbiology

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Alireza Neshani 1
Alireza Moaddab 2
Jamal Asgarpour 3
1 Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Basic Sciences Research Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
10.22038/fmej.2026.95284.1729
Abstract
Background: The integration of digital technologies into medical education has necessitated a shift toward student-centered pedagogical models. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multi-platform flipped classroom (FC) model on academic achievement, student engagement, and satisfaction within a practical microbiology course.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 70 medical laboratory students at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The cohorts were divided into a traditional group (n = 35; year 2024) and an FC group (n = 35; year 2025). The FC group engaged in asynchronous pre-class preparation via instructional videos and digital resources, reinforced by mandatory introductory quizzes, while synchronous lab time was dedicated to interactive manual techniques. Data were collected using final academic grades and a validated 6-item Likert scale questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests.
Results: Although the FC group achieved a slightly higher mean grade (17.06 ± 2.66) compared to the traditional group (16.89 ± 1.95), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.76). However, the FC model yielded a substantial increase in student satisfaction (4.86 ± 0.4) compared to the traditional group (3.70 ± 0.90) (P < 0.001) and active engagement (4.67 ± 0.52) compared to the traditional group (3.25 ± 0.88) (P < 0.001). Notably, class participation scores increased by 87% in the flipped cohort.
Conclusion: While the flipped classroom model did not significantly alter raw academic scores, it fundamentally enhanced the educational environment by fostering superior student engagement and satisfaction. This model represents a robust alternative for practical laboratory instruction in the digital era.
Keywords
Flipped Classroom
Microbiology
Medical Education
Student Engagement
Active Learning
Subjects
1.            Pearse C, Scott S. A review of clinical laboratory education, training and progression: historical challenges, the impact of COVID-19 and future considerations. Br J Biomed Sci. 2023;80:11266.
2.            Wang J, Jiang Y, Yang J, Zhou Q, Hu H, Chen Y, et al. Application of virtual simulations in the practical teaching of clinical microbiology laboratory courses. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):1024.
3.            Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.
4.            Chen F-Z, Chen L-A, Tseng C-C, Pai CH, Tsai K-E, Liang E-C, et al. Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in life sciences: implementing interactive learning environments and flipped classroom models. Discov Educ. 2025;4(1):102.
5.            Martín-Alguacil N, Avedillo L. Student-centered active learning improves performance in solving higher-level cognitive questions in health sciences education. International Medical Education. 2024;3(3):346-62.
6.            Phillips J, Wiesbauer F. The flipped classroom in medical education: A new standard in teaching. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2022;42:4-8.
7.            Fischer K, Sullivan AM, Cohen AP, King RW, Cockrill BA, Besche HC. Using cognitive load theory to evaluate and improve preparatory materials and study time for the flipped classroom. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):345.
8.            Rathnayaka C, Ganapathi J, Kickbusch S, Dawes L, Brown R. Preparative pre-laboratory online resources for effectively managing cognitive load of engineering students. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2024;49(1):113-38.
9.            Shi X-Y, Yin Q, Wang Q-W, Lu B-R, Li G-X, Huang S-H, et al. Is the flipped classroom more effective than the traditional classroom in clinical medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Educ. 2025;Volume 9 - 2024.
10.          Algarni A. Biomedical students’ self-efficacy and academic performance by gender in a flipped learning haematology course. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):443.
11.          Spaic D, Bukumiric Z, Rajovic N, Markovic K, Savic M, Milin-Lazovic J, et al. The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27.
12.          Soriano-Estrella AL. The Evolution of Medical Education: From Teacher-centered to Learner-centered Approaches. Acta Med Philipp. 2025;59(6):6-8.
13.          O'Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet High Educ. 2015;25:85-95.
14.          Ridha M, Rahman F, Islamy MI. Students learning engagement in the flipped classroom: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan. 2024;11(3):267-84.
15.          Pilu R, Jabu B, Sulaiman I. Flipped learning and its challenges: understanding students' struggles in Indonesian EFL contexts from teachers' viewpoint. Front Educ. 2025;Volume 10 - 2025.
16.          Safitri E, Sofia BFD, Ningsih BNS, Savalas LRT. The effect of pre-class quizzes assisted flipped classroom learning on student learning outcomes in the biochemistry course of fatty acid metabolism. Jurnal Pijar Mipa. 2023;18(6):898-903.
17.          Qu M, Hou Q, Li X, Yu C, Xia J, Dong Z. Application of a flipped classroom incorporating modified team-based learning in molecular biology laboratory teaching: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1442.