AI and the Evolution of Medical Education: Speed, Scale, and Stewardship

Editorial

Author

1 Clinical Professor, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

2 Clinical Professor, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Editor-in-Chief, Future of Medical Education Journal

Abstract

Medical education has evolved through successive accelerants—from writing and the printing press to the internet—each expanding the speed, reach, and fidelity of learning. This editorial argues that artificial intelligence (AI) is the next inflection point in that evolutionary arc. We synthesize recent reviews across health professions and propose an educator-led governance roadmap. We also conduct a rapid bibliometric scan (titles containing “AI” and “education”) in PubMed and OpenAlex (2023–2025) to illustrate early diffusion dynamics.
Across the literature, near-term opportunities cluster around three domains: 1) personalization at scale via adaptive practice, formative feedback, and multilingual access; 2) workflow augmentation, including generation of learning materials, items, and rubrics; and 3) high-fidelity practice using simulation and conversational agents for clinical reasoning and communication. Evidence for short-term knowledge and skills gains is promising but fragile, as most studies are small, single-site, and of brief duration, and rarely assess downstream competence, equity, or safety. Salient risks include hallucinations and bias, privacy and confidentiality concerns, threats to assessment integrity, and potential erosion of learner agency without careful scaffolding.
Our bibliometric indicator retrieved 419 PubMed records and 1,745 OpenAlex author-affiliation entries, with contributions led by high-income countries yet rapidly emerging across middle- and low-income settings—suggesting a shortening lag from innovation to global uptake. We recommend human-in-the-loop use, transparent disclosure, data safeguards, redesign of assessment processes, faculty capacity-building, and rigorous evaluation with equity and safety endpoints. If aligned with learning science and ethical governance, AI can compress discovery-to-practice cycles and narrow disparities—enhancing, rather than replacing, the human relationships at the heart of medical training.

Keywords


  1. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray; 1859.
  2. Tomasello M. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999.
  3. Henrich J. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2015.
  4. Erduran S. Education must evolve with AI-driven science. Sci Educ. 2023;32(5):1001-1008.
  5. Wang Y, Jiang J. AI for education: trends and insights. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2025;22:34.
  6. Whiten A. The evolution and cultural transmission of human cumulative culture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372(1735):20170068.
  7. Leoni R. The evolution of education systems and the future of work. Econ Labour Relat Rev. 2025;36(1):45-63.
  8. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257-285.
  9. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):249-255.
  10. Bloom BS. Learning for mastery. Eval Comment. 1968;1(2):1-12.
  11. Fazackerley A, Kruger J, Lewis J, et al. Enhancing physiology education through generative AI. Adv Physiol Educ. 2025;49(1):12-20.
  12. Bjork RA. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP, eds. Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994:185-205.
  13. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979;13(1):41-54.
  14. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-645.
  15. ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for competency-based medical education: a six-step approach. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):641-647.
  16. Eisenstein EL. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
  17. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:160018.
  18. Korkmaz G, Toraman Ç. Are we ready for the post-COVID-19 educational practice? An investigation into what educators think as to online learning. Int J Technol Educ Sci. 2022;6(1):61-79.
  19. Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2010.
  20. Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. 2020; March 27.
  21. Zapata-Rivera D, Finkelstein J, Rupp A. Generative AI as a catalyst for educational innovation. Br J Educ Technol. 2024;55(3):567-573.
  22. Xu B, Zhang H, Guo Y, et al. Artificial intelligence in higher education: opportunities and challenges. Comput Educ. 2024;210:104796.
  23. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10-28.
  24. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978-988.
  25. Uribe SE, Maldupa I, Schwendicke F. Integrating generative AI in dental education: a scoping review of current practices and recommendations. Eur J Dent Educ. 2025;29(2):341-355.
  26. Pit SW, Hamiduzzaman M, Schneider CR, Barraclough F. Evaluation framework for conversational AI agents in pharmacy education: a scoping review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025;21(10):729-742.
  27. Hakamada K. Robotics, AI, and the future of surgical training. Surg Today. 2023;53(10):789-792.
  28. Lind J. A Treatise of the Scurvy. Edinburgh: Sands, Murray and Cochran; 1753.
  29. Carpenter KJ. The History of Scurvy and Vitamin C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
  30. VanLehn K. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ Psychol. 2011;46(4):197-221.
  31. Torres-Lima K, Barrón-González D, Ramírez-Pérez S, Martínez-Palacios J. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025;16:1-12.
  32. Kranz A, Abele H. The impact of artificial intelligence on midwifery education: a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(11):1082.
  33. Kizilcec RF. To advance AI use in education, focus on understanding educators. Comput Educ. 2023;193:104674.
  34. Wiederhold BK. AI’s transformative potential for educators and learners. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2025;28(4):213-215.
  35. Weidener L, Fischer M. Teaching AI ethics in medical education: a scoping review of current literature and practices. Perspect Med Educ. 2023;12(1):399-410.
  36. An X, Li H, Tang Y, et al. Users’ perspectives on ethical issues in artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review. Comput Educ. 2024;210:104795.
  37. Katznelson L, Gerke S. Integrating AI ethics into medical education curriculum. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(9):E713-E720.
  38. Roberts LW. Generative AI’s implications for scholarly practice. Acad Psychiatry. 2024;48(3):231-236.
  39. Otterbacher J. Detection tools aren’t enough: AI content detection’s limitations. Commun ACM. 2025;68(2):21-23.
  40. Daungsupawong K, Wiwanitkit V. The emerging role of AI in patient education. J Patient Exp. 2024;11:237437352412345.
  41. Günay T, Erdem H, Yıldırım F, et al. ChatGPT-4 for patient education in chest pain: potentials and pitfalls. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;74:345-346.
  42. Ihsan S, Rahman A, Chaudhry H, et al. Generative AI for pediatric kidney transplant education. Pediatr Transplant. 2024;28(4):e14325.
  43. Samaan F, Al-Khudairi H, Yousif A. Inclusive AI for diverse bariatric surgery education. Obes Surg. 2024;34(6):2015-2018.
  44. Shishehgar M, Brown J, Davis K, et al. Artificial intelligence in health education and practice. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025;18:145-159.
  45. Mwuara C, Musyoka M, Adan A, et al. Artificial intelligence-based chatbots in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:89.
  46. Preiksaitis CM, Rose S. Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: a review of current applications and challenges. Acad Med. 2023;98(11):e118-e126.
  47. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2023.
  48. AI and the Future of Education: Policy Note. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2023.
  49. Montejo MA, Andone D. Artificial intelligence in nursing education: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;133:105826.
  50. Nagi F, Salih R, Alzubaidi M, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023;305:648-651.
  51. Mortlock R, Lucas C. Generative artificial intelligence in pharmacy education: utilization and implications for academic integrity—a scoping review. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024;15:100481.
  52. Feigerlova E, Tesarova M, Pavlikova M, et al. Implementation of large language models in medical education—perspectives of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:123.
  53. Principles for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2024.
  54. Hasan MK. Reclaiming educational joy in the AI era. Comput Educ. 2025;220:104850.
  55. Sousa MJ, Rocha Á, Marques J. AI and blockchain as catalysts for inclusive education. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):5432.
  56. Liu J, Chen Y, Wang H, et al. Towards emotion AI in healthcare and education. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7:132456.