A comparative study of objectively structured and traditional viva voce for second-year MBBS students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Autonomous State Medical College, Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh, India

2 Maharshi Vashishtha Autonomous State Medical College, Basti, Uttar Pradesh, India

3 Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

10.22038/fmej.2025.87999.1648

Abstract

Background: The traditional viva voce (TVV) has been criticised for its subjectivity and susceptibility to academic and non-academic biases related to both teachers and students. To address these concerns, the objectively structured viva voce (OSVV) format has been proposed. This study compared the effectiveness of OSVV with that of TVV and explored the perceptions of second-year MBBS students and faculty members towards OSVV.
Method: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted with 102 second-year MBBS students. Each student underwent both TVV and OSVV assessments. The mean scores obtained through both methods were calculated. A Likert scale-based questionnaire was administered to students and faculty members to assess their perceptions of OSVV. The results were analysed using percentages and frequencies.
Results: The mean score achieved in OSVV (12.80 ± 1.73) was significantly higher than that in TVV (11.30 ± 1.80). A total of 76.4% of students strongly agreed that OSVV was fairer than TVV. All faculty members (100%) strongly agreed that OSVV was a more structured method, comprehensively covering the syllabus across various levels of difficulty.
Conclusion: OSVV was found to be a more effective and equitable method of viva assessment compared with TVV. Both students and faculty members perceived OSVV as a fairer and more structured approach. While some participants considered it stressful and time-consuming, these concerns can be mitigated through ongoing training and orientation for both students and faculty.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Anderson J, Roberts FJ. A New Look at Medical Education. London: Pitman Medical; 1965.
  2. Cox KR. How to improve oral examinations. Med J Aust. 1978;2 (10):176-77.
  3. Anbarasi K, Karunakaran JV, Ravichandran L, Arthi B. Effectiveness of the Structured and Conventional Methods of Viva Examination in Medical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Diag Res. 2022;16(9): JE01-JE07.
  4. Weingarten MA, Polliack MR, Tabenkin H, Kahan E. Variations among examiners in family medicine residency board oral examinations. Med Educ. 2000;34(1):13-17.
  5. Torke S, Abraham RR, Ramnarayan K, Asha K. The impact of viva-voce examination on students’ performance in theory component of the final summative examination in physiology. J Physiol Pathophysiol 2010;1:10-2.
  6. Rahman N, Ferdousi S, Hoq N, Amin R, Kabir J. Evaluation of objective structured practical examination and traditional practical examination. Mymensingh Med J. 2007;16(1):7-11.
  7. Puppalwar PV, Rawekar A, Chalak A, Dhok A, Khapre M. Introduction of Objectively Structured Viva-Voce in Formative Assessment of Medical and Dental Undergraduates in Biochemistry. J Res Med Educ Ethics. 2014;4(3):321-5.
  8. Ferdousi S, Latif SA, Ahmed MM, Nessa A. Summative assessment of under graduate medical student’s performance in physiology by structured oral examination. Mymensingh Med J [Internet]. 2007;16(1):64–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/mmj.v16i1.251.
  9. Shaikh S. Objective Structured Viva Examination Versus Traditional Viva Examination in Evaluation of Medical Students. Anat Physiol.2015;5:3.
  10. Shenwai MR, Patil B. Introduction of Structured Oral Examination as A Novel Assessment tool to First Year Medical Students in Physiology. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(11):2544-47.
  11. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. 1975. Assessment of Clinical Competence using Objective Structured Examination. BMJ. 1:447–51.
  12. Imran M, Doshi C, Kharadi D. Structured and unstructured viva voce assessment: A double-blind, randomized, comparative evaluation of medical students. Int J Health Sci. 2019;13(2):3-9.
  13. Rajani M, Ghewade B. Comparison of student performance by assessment through Objective Structured Practical Examination versus the Conventional Method for second year MBBS students in Microbiology. J Adv Med Edu Prof. 2020;8(3):121-6.
  14. Witheridge A, Ferns G, Scott-Smith W. Revisiting Miller's pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Int J Med Educ. 2019;10:191-92.
  15. Bada, Olusegun S. Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR J Res Method Educ. 2015; 5(6): 66-70.
  16. Ali QI. Towards more effective summative assessment in OBE: a new framework integrating direct measurements and technology. Discov Educ. 2024;3:107.
  17. Rahman H, Rahman MA. A Review on Structured Oral Examination (SOE) Dinajpur Med Col J. 2016;9(1):113-7.
  18. Dangre-Mudey G, Damke S, Tankhiwale N, Mudey A. Assessment of perception
    for objectively structured viva voce amongst undergraduate medical students and teaching faculties in a medical college of central India. Int J Res Med Sci 2016; 4:2951-4.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 15, Issue 2
June 2025
Pages 34-40

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics