EAP instructors’ professional development and their knowledge sharing: A case of nursing courses

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science,College of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Department of ELT, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Background: It has been agreed upon by educators and scholars that one of the key successes in any educational setting is promoting the professional development of teachers. Having this in mind, the researchers of the present study investigated nursing English for academic purposes (EAP) and instructors’ perceptions of knowledge sharing. In addition, they sought whether EAP instructors’ perceptions of knowledge sharing would predict their professional development.
Methods: Ninety-four EAP instructors from different medical universities across the country were recruited in the present study.Two questionnaires of ‘EAP instructors’ perception towards knowledge sharing’ scale and ‘a teacher professional development’ were used to gather data. A semi-structured interview was also performed to explore the participants’ opinions regarding the inhibitors to develop teacher learning communities.
Results:The results showed that the mean of EAP instructors' perception of knowledge sharing in the sample group was 2.90 with a standard deviation of 0.338 which was lower than the expected average (3). Also, there was a positive and significant relationship between the perception of EAP instructors and knowledge sharing with respect to the level of significance (sig= 0.000) and the error rate of 0.01 with their professional development. In addition, the multiple regression analysis showed that cultural, reflective, personal cost and sharing, and organizational variables were able to explain the variance of professional development. As the findings of the semi-structured interview revealed, among other factors, instructors’ lack of incentive, lack of commitment, and their lack of familiarity with the importance of teacher learning communities were the major inhibitors to developing teacher learning communities among EAP instructors.
Conclusion: Knowledge management can become a rudimentary strategy which may pave the way to personal/professional development. This sheds light on the importance of collaborative work which should take place within an educational setting. Accordingly, some implications have been suggested to encourage knowledge sharing among EAP instructors.

Keywords


1. Farahian M, Parhamnia F. Nursing students’ information-seeking behavior in ESP courses: Do quality of education and reflective practice matter?, Future Med Educ J. 2020; 10 (2): 9-15.
2. Rajprasit K, Pratoomrat P, Wang T. Perceptions and Problems of English Language and Communication Abilities: A Final Check on Thai Engineering Undergraduate. English Language Teaching. 2015; 8(3): 111-20.
3. Ghonsooly B, Pishgadam R. A critique on ESP books: examining general English at university level. Quarterly Journal of Language and Translation Studies. 2011; 42 (3): 21-36. Persian.
4. Hargreaves D. The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1994; 10(4), 423–38.
5. Hargreaves A, Fullan M. Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2012.
6. Seo K. Professional learning of observers, collaborators, and contributors in a teacher-created online community in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2014; 34(3): 337-50.  
7. Alibakhshi G, Dehvari N. EFL teachers’ perceptions of continuing professional development: A case of Iranian high school teachers. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development. 2015; 17(2), 29-42.
8. Bailey KM, Curtis A, Nunan D. Pursuing professional development: The self as source. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 2001.
9. Novozhenina A, López Pinzón MM. Impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ performance’, HOW Journal. 2018; 25(2): 113-28.
10. Cirocki A, Farrell TSC. Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System. 2019; 85: 1-14.
11. Grossman P, Wineburg S, Woolworth S. Toward a theory of teacher community. Teach Coll Rec. 2001; 103 (6): 942–1012.
12. McLaughlin MW, Talbert JE. Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York; London: Teachers College Press, 2006.
13. Bhojaraju G. Knowledge management: Why do we need it for corporates. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 2005; 10 (2): 37-50.
14. North K, Babakhanlou R. Knowledge Management Tools for SMES. In: North K, Varvakis G, editors. Competitive Strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises. 2016: 211-22.
15. Runhaar P, Sanders K. Promoting teachers’ knowledge sharing. The fostering roles of occupational self-efficacy and Human Resources Management. 2015: 1-20.
16. Wang S, Noe R. Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Human Resource Management Review. 2010; 20 (2): 115-31.
17. Yu T, Lu T, Liu T. Exploring Factors that Influence Knowledge Sharing Behavior Via Web Logs”, Comput Human Behav. 2010; 26 (1): 32-41.
18. Adamseged HY, Hong JJ. Knowledge sharing among university faculty members. Journal of Education and Practice. 2018; 9(24): 1-10.
19. Van Woerkom M. The concept of critical reflection and its implications for human resource development. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2004; 6: 178–93.
20. Avalos B. Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011; 27(1): 10-20.
21. Bulan SJ, Sensuse DI. KNOWLEDGE SHARING MODEL AMONG ACADEMIC STAFFS IN UNIVERSITIES. Journal of Information Systems, 2012; 8(2): 133-39.
22. Krečič MJ, Grmek MI. Cooperative learning and team culture in schools: Conditions for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2008; 24: 59-68.
23. Admiraal W, Lockhorst D, Van der Pol J. An expert study of a descriptive model of teacher communities. Learning Environments Research, 2013; 15: 345–61.
24. Chen Y, Chen N, Tsai C. The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers & Education, 2009; 53(4):1155-66. doi= doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2009.05.026  
25. Clarà M, Mauri T, Colomina R,  Javier O. Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: a case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2019;42(2): 1-17.
26. Daniel GR, Auhl G, Hastings W. Collaborative feedback and Reflection for professional growth: Preparing first-year pre-service teachers for participation in the community of practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 2013; 41 (2): 159-72.
27. McLaughlin MW, Talbert JE. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
28. Meirink JA, Meijer PC, Verloop N. A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative setting. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 2007; 13, 145–64.
29. Ipe M. Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review. 2003; 2 (4): 337-59.
30. Ipe M. Knowledge sharing in organizations: An analysis of motivators and inhibitors. Proceedings of Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD) Austin, 3-7 March. 2004: 399-406.
31. Karasneh AA‐F, Al‐zoubi M. Factors affecting knowledge sharing in special education- A Jordanian study. Knowl Process Manag. 2019; 26:41-50.
32. Soodmand Afshar H, Ghasemi S. Developing and Validating a Model for Exploring Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perception of Professional Development. Journal of Teaching Language Skills. 2018; 37 (3): 169-210.
33. Merriam SB. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
 
34. Chaudhry AS, Sivakamasundari B. Perceptions of Teachers about knowledge sharing in schools. 2004. Retrieved from Sivakamasundari/32334/?isxn=9781616921255.
35. Yeh Y-C, Huang L-y, Yeh Y-L. Knowledge management in blended learning: Effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Computers & Education. 2011; 56 (1): 146-56.
36. Chen Y, Chen NS, Tsai CC. The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers & Education. 2009; 53 (4): 1155-66.
37. Hur JW, Brush TA. Teacher Participation in Online Communities: Why Do Teachers Want to Participate in Self-generated Online Communities of K–12 Teachers?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2009; 41(3): 279–303.
38. Kosmos P. Online sharing of knowledge among in-service teachers for professional development purposes. Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers. 2017; Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3175536.3175557
39. Putnam RT, Borko H. What do new views of knowledge have to say about research on teacher learning?  Educational Researcher. 2000; 29 (1): 4-14.
40. Brouwer J, Jansen E. Beyond grades: developing knowledge sharing in learning communities as a graduate attribute. Higher Education Research & Development. 2019; 38 (2): 219-34.
41. Convery N. Information management, records management, knowledge management: The place of archives in a digital age. In: Hill, J. editor. The future of archives and recordkeeping: A reader. London: Facet Publishing. 2010: 191-210.
42. Gupta AK, Govindarajan V. Knowledge management's social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel″. Sloan Manage Rev. 2000; 42 (1): 71-80.
43. Jong L de, Meirink J, Admiraal W. School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019; 86: 1-12.
44. Mawhinney L. Let's lunch and learn: Professional knowledge sharing in teachers' lounges and other congregational spaces″. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2010; 26 (4): 972-78.
45. Robbins P, Alvy HB. The principal’s companion: Strategies and hints to make the job easier. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2003.
46. Nelson TH, Slavitt D, Perkins M, Hathorn T. A culture of collaborative inquiry: Learning to develop and support professional learning communities. Teach Coll Rec. 2008; 110 (6): 1269-303.
47. Mann S, Walsh S. Reflective Practice in English Language Teaching Research-Based Principles and Practices. New York: Routledge, 2017.
48. Gairín J, Rodríguez-Gómez D. Teacher professional development through knowledge management in educational organizations. In: Ola Lindberg J, Andrea D, editors. Online Learning Communities and Teacher Professional Development: Methods for Improved Education Delivery (pp.1-20). IGI-Global Publishing; 2010. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-780-5.ch008.