Towards Basic Sciences Curriculum Reform in General Medicine at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Medical Education, Medical School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Integration is accepted as an important strategy in medical education and its final results depend on organizing different topics. In this method, the subjects (based on content) which are often included separately in a curriculum, are integrated in order to link and combine the content of the curriculum to create a cohesive learning experience. Development of this method is among the objectives of the medical education reform.
Methods: The present applied cross-sectional study was performed on a statistical population (n=602) consisting of general medicine students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences at the level of basic sciences. The participants were selected using the census sampling method and included 150 and 130 students who were admitted in February 2017 (the reformed curriculum) and in February 2016 (the conventional curriculum), respectively. The curriculums were compared in terms of learning outcomes and the number of vulnerable students. Moreover, the research hypotheses were tested using the independent t-test and chi-square test in SPSS software (version 22).
Results: Based on the findings, with 95% confidence, the learning outcomes of the students who followed the reformed curriculum were better than those of the students who followed the conventional curriculum. According to the analysis of the collected data, the mean learning outcomes for the conventional and the reformed curriculum groups were 14.30±3.28 and 16.76±2.80 for the subject of anatomy, 14.10±2.62 and 15.13±2.93 for the subject of physiology, and 14.35±3.13 and 15.44±2.85 for the subject of biochemistry. However, no significant difference was observed in the number of vulnerable students in two groups.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, basic sciences curriculum reform in medical education can improve the academic achievement of the general medicine students. 

Keywords

References

  1. Avizhgan M, Omid A, Dehghani M, Esmaeili A, Asilian A, Akhlaghi M R, et al. Determining Minimum Skill Achievements in Advanced Clinical Clerkship (Externship) in School of Medicine Using Logbooks. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10(5):543-51. Persian.
  2. Sabzghabaee A M, Izadi Mood N, Memarzadeh M, Shirani S, Yamani N. Designing and Implementing a Practical Course of "Pharmacotherapy in Special Populations" for Medical Interns. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10(5):815-21. Persian.
  3. Hosseini S, Vartanoosian J, Hosseini F, Farzin Fard F. Validity and reliability of OSCE/OSPE in assessing biochemistry laboratory skills of freshman nursing students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery. 2013;23(80):34- 43.
  4. Dadvar L, Dadgari A, Mirzaee M, Rezaee M. Evaluation of Educational Goals Achievement in Fundamental Nursing Clinical Skills: Application OSCE among Senior Nursing Students in ICU. Knowledge and Health. 2015;9(4):24-31. Persian.
  5. Khalifehzadeh A, Tavasoli A A, Golshahi J, Sanei H, Mirdehghan A, Payehdar Z, et al. Synergy Model in Clinical Teaching of Critical Care MSc Nursing Students and Cardiovascular Diseases Patients. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10(5):593-601. Persian.
  6. Haghani F, Alavi M. An introduction to some new approaches in clinical education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10(5):801-06. Persian.
  7. Bahramian H, Bahmani F, Aghababaei A A. Study of Curriculum Changes and Sequence of Anatomy Courses on Medical Students Score of Esfahan Medical Sciences University. Anatomical Sciences Journal. 2010;8(1):77-83. Persian.
  8. Yamani N, Shater Jalali M. Curriculum Integration, With Emphasis on Integration in Medical Education.  Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2012;11(9):1202-13. Persian.
  9. Teimouri Jervekani Z, Ashoorion V, Mozafarpour S, Sirous S. Evaluation of Basic Sciences Curriculum Modifications in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: The Students’ Viewpoint. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2015;15:79-88. Persian.
  10. Prince KJ, Van Mameren H, Hylkema N, Drukker J, Scherpbier AJ, Van Der Vleuten CP. Does problem‐based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy. Medical Education. 2003;37(1):15-21.
  11. Vuori H and Jonas S. Finnish Reform of Medical Education: Implications for the United States. Health Policy and Education. 1980;1(4): 367-82.
  12. Lueddeke GR. Transforming Medical Education for the 21st Century. 2012. Published by CRC Press.
  13. Whitehead C. Recipes for medical education reform: Will different ingredients create better doctors? A commentary on Sales and Schlaffq. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;70(11):1672-76. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.017.
  14. Parrish RK, Mladenovic J, Gedde SJ. Health care reform and graduate medical education in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(4):572-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.017. PMID: 21420521.
  15. Vassallo P, Jeremiah J, Forman L, Dubois L, Simmons DL, Chretien K, et al. Parental Leave in Graduate Medical Education: Recommendations for Reform. The American Journal of Medicine. 2019;132(3):385-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.11.006.
  16. Kapoor D, Tiwari K, Faruqi A, Garg A, Gupta S, Nain S, et al. Proposed Reforms in Medical Education in India: Perspective of Undergraduate Students. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2020;8(1):305-07. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.03.012.
  17. Wang S, Fu X, Liu Z, Wang B, Tang Y, Feng H, et al. General Practitioner Education Reform in China: Most Undergraduate Medical Students do not Choose General Practitioner as a Career under the 5+3 Model. Health Professions Educations. 2018;4(2):127-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.05.001.
  18. Medical education reform in China. The Lancet. 2017; 390(10092):334.
  19. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet 2010; 376: 1923-58.
  20. The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. The Future of Medical Education in Canada (FMEC): A Collective Vision for MD Education. Ottawa: The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada; 2010.
  21. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. The Journal of Chiropractic Education. 2011;25(2):193-95.
  22. World Health Organization. The World Health Report: Working Together for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
  23. Ivanitskaya L, Deborah C, George M, Ronald P. Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes. Innovative Higher Education. 2002;27(2):95-111.
  24. Jelsing EJ, Lachman N, O’Neil AE, Pawlina W. Can a Flexible Medical Curriculum Promote Student Learning and Satisfaction? Annals of the Academy of Medicine. 2007; 36 (9): 713-18.
  25. Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ. 2000;34(7):551-57.
  26. Ahmadi P. Analysis of the Numerousness and Variety of Integration Concept in the Curriculum. IRPHE. 2003;9(3):87-124. Persian.
  27. Khazaei M. Medical Students' Viewpoints toward Clinical Physiology Presentation in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;10 (5):602-08. Persian.
  28. Yazdani Sh HF, Homayoni Zand R. Reform of the General medicine training program (Basic Science phase): Theoretical and review experience.Tehran: Development Center for Medical Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2008. Persian.
  29. Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V. How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? A BEME systematic review. Medical teacher. 2006;28(1):3-18.
  30. Dahle L, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Medical teacher. 2002;24(3):280-5.
  31. Abdolmaleki A SM, Farshad A, Joneidi Jafari A, Mohtadi N. Study of occupational health research and educational challenges from the perspective of students. The 1th National Conference on the Evaluation of the University Systems. Sanati Sharif University; 2014 May 7-8; Tehran, Iran. Persian.
  32. Sales CS, Schlaff AL. Reforming medical education: A review and synthesis of five critiques of medical practice. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;70(11): 1665-8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.018.
  33. Sales CS, Schlaff AL. Reforming medical education: A response to Weller and Woodward, and Whitehead, and Schwabq. Social Science & Medicine. 2010.70(11):1680-81. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.015.
  34. Kwan J.Y.Y, Nyhof-Young J, Catton P, Meredith E. Giuliani. Mapping the Future: Towards Oncology Curriculum Reform in Undergraduate Medical Education at a Canadian Medical School. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(3):669-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.017.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
December 2020
Pages 25-31

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics