Impact of multimedia as a teaching tool on the performance of the 1st year MBBS students for academic achievements in India

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, India

2 Department of Community Medicine, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, India

3 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India

Abstract

Background: There are various methods of teaching adopted by teachers/professors in medical colleges to deliver the lectures to the students. The present study aimed to find out the impact of multimedia as a teaching tool on the performance of the 1st year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students for academic achievements.
Methods: This was a Quasi-experimental study, conducted for three months (April to June 2016) at Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, India.Total of 150 students of the 1st year MBBS were recruited for this study and two groups were formed (i.e. Group I and Group II). Each group included 75 students. Group I were taught by a traditional way of teaching and Group II were taught by using multimedia. Two tools were used viz, pre and posttest based on MCQs to assess the impact of multimedia on students’ academic achievement. After taking the post-academic test, both groups were rotated i.e. in group I, lectures were delivered by using multimedia and in group II, lectures were delivered by the traditional way of teaching in order to get feedback from all 150 students to know the better way of teaching method.
 Results: There was no significant difference in the average marks obtained by students between Group I and II (18.73±3.39 % vs. 18.8±3.76 %) before delivering lectures to them. However, after delivering the lectures, the average mark obtained by the students of Group II was found to be significantly higher as compared to Group I (70.78±12.01 % vs. 49.33±9.75 %).
Conclusion: The use of interactive multimedia tool found to be more effective for presenting the information than the traditional way of teaching. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Yamauchi LG. Effects of multimedia instructional material on students’ learning and their perceptions of the instruction. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 15324. Iowa: Iowa State University; 2008.
  2. Afyouni B, Tabatabai M, Ghasempour A. A comparative study of lecture-based and multimedia-based training method on the second year students competency in general electronics course in the Technical and Vocational School. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2016;7(4):227-33.
  3. Carlson S. Wired to the hilt. Chron High Educ. 2002;48(29):A33-A35.
  4. Shah I, Khan M. Impact of multimedia-aided teaching on students’ academic achievement and attitude at elementary level. US-China Education Review A 2015;5(5):349-60.
  5. Gilakjani A. The significant role of multimedia in motivating EFL learners’ interest in English language learning. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science 2012; 4:57-66. Retrieved from: http://www.mecs-press.org/ijmecs/ijmecs-v4-n4/IJMECS-V4-N4-8.pdf
  6. Reddi UV, Mishra S. Educational multimedia. A handbook for teacher-developers. A publication for the Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. 2003. Retrieved from: http://www.cemca.org/emhandbook/edmul_full.pdf
  7. Mayer RE, editor. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
  8. Nusir S, Alsmadi I. Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs at children ability to learn basic math skills. Acta Didactica Napocensia 2012;5(2):17-32.
  9. Vyas P. A Comparative study of traditional and multimedia supported techniques for imparting communication skills at the Tertiary level [PhD thesis]. Pilani, India: BITS; 2013.
  10. Nwaocha VO. Enhance students interest in mathematics via multimedia presentation. Afr.  J. Math. Comput. Sci. Res. 2010;3(7):107-113. Available online at http//www.academicjournals.org/AJMCSR.
  11. Saini P, Kaur J, Kaur M, Thappar K, Bindu K. The effect of power point and traditional lectures on students' achievement in nursing. Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal 2015;11(4):175-84.
  12. Sarmento e souza MF, Ferreira ASSB, Martinez JC, Barraviera B. The impact of multimedia on teaching tropical medicine. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2004;10(2):173-84.
  13. Kapri UC. Impact of multimedia in teaching of science. IJARIIE 2017;3(4):2179-87.
  14. Ilhan GO, Oruç S. Effect of the use of multimedia on students’ performance: A case study of social studies class. Educ Res Rev. 2016;11(8):877-82.
  15. Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Moghe V. PowerPoint or chalk and talk: Perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2010; 1:11-16.
  16. Atkins-Sayre W, Hopkins S, Mohundro S, Sayre W. Rewards and liabilities of presentation software as an ancillary tool: Prison or paradise? Paper presented at The National Communication Association Eighty Fourth Annual Convention, New York; 1988.
  17. Mantei EJ. Using Internet class notes and PowerPoint in the physical geology lecture. J Coll Sci Teach. 2000; 29:301-05.
  18. Szabo A, Hastings N. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Comput Educ. 2000; 35:175-87.
  19. Panagiotis A, Elias M, Apostolos S, Euagelos T. Multimedia: an instructional tool in the teaching process of alpine ski. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education 2006;941-45.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2
Summer
June 2019
Pages 46-51

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics