Identification of the reasons behind students' lack of participation in classroom activities using a Delphi technique

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of English Language, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Kerman Institute of Higher Education, Kerman, Iran

3 Ph.D candidate, School of medicine, Islamic Azad University of Shahrood, Shahrood, Iran.

4 Education Development Centre, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

5 Ph.D candidate, Education Development Centre, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: Participation is considered as a pivotal concept in understanding classroom instruction and development of critical thinking skills necessary for students. Students who actively participate in classroom settings will perform far more than those who do not. Therefore, it is important to establish a consensus about the underlying reasons for students' lack of participation in classroom activities as interpreted by faculty members.
Methods: A Delphi technique was used in three rounds to obtain the perspectives of faculty members of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (KMU) concerning students’ lack of participation in class activities in 2014. A total of 13 expert panelists from diverse disciplines were invited to the study using purposive sampling. Content analysis ensured consensus on the identified reasons. 
Results: In the first round, 78 reasons were identified by the panelists. After removing duplicates and similarities 52 reasons were obtained and categorized into 14 condensed units. In the second round, preliminary consensus was obtained and the included 14 factors were scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 to rank order them. In round three, final consensus was granted from all participants. Data were analyzed using content analysis and by obtaining the sum of answers, seven factors were highlighted as the most important. These included factors related to motivation (4.80), grading system (4.72), meaningful teaching (4.50), major influence (4.27), peers influence (4.13), challenging assignment (4.03), and environmental influence (4.00).
Conclusion: Students' learning to a large extent is dependent upon their participation in the classroom. The identification of the reasons concerning students’ lack of participation in this study may help teachers arrange an environment to enrich dynamic learning for every learner to enthusiastically take part in classroom activities.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Abedini Z, JafarBegloo E, Raeisi M, Dadkhah Tehrani T. Effectiveness of reflection in clinical education: Nursing students’ perspective. Iran Journal of Nursing (IJN) 2011; 24(71): 74-82. Persian.
 2. Turner JC, Patrick H. Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teach Coll Rec. 2004; 106(9):1759-85.
3. Billings D, Halstead J. Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2009.
4. Lee YL, Chien TF, Kuo MC, Chang P. The relationship of learning motivation, achievement and satisfaction for nurses learning simple Excel VBA Information Systems Programming. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 201:364-70.
5. Beigzadeh A, Haghani F. Active learning methods: a way of tackling large classroom setting. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2016; 13 (1): 107-13.
 6. Nunn C E. Discussion in the college classroom. Journal of Higher Education 1996; 67(3): 243−66.
 7. Tinto V. Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational Character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education 1997; 68: 599−623.
 8. Pedditzi LM, Spigno M. Motivation to learn: a research on university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012; 69: 1198 –207.
9. Tatar S. Why keep silent? The classroom participation experiences of non-native-English-speaking students. Language and Intercultural Communication 2005; 5(3-4):284-93.
 10. Howard JR, James Iii GH, Taylor DR. The consolidation of responsibility in the mixed-age college classroom. Teaching Sociology 2002;214-34.
 11. Crawford M, MacLeod M. Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the "chilly climate"‌ for women. Sex Roles 1990; 23(3-4):101-22.
 12. Chan B, McCroskey JC. The WTC scale as a predictor of classroom participation. Commun Res Rep. 1987; 4(2):47-50.
 13. Fritschner LM. Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. Journal of Higher Education 2000:342-62.
 14. Hosseinzadeh K, Derakhshan F, Sarchami R. Students’ Participation in Teaching and its Improvement Methods: A Review Study. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2017; 13 (6): 607-16.
 15. Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2007; 12 (10):1-8.
 16. Powell C. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 41(4):376–82. Review.
 17. Manning K. Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qual Inq. 1997; 3(1):93-115.
 18. Haghani F, Rezaei H, beigzadeh A, Eghbali B. Flipped Classroom: A Pedagogical Method. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2016; 16: 104-19. Persian.
 19. Beigzadeh A, Rahimi M, Nazarieh M. Social family models: a way to foster social skills and learning. Res Dev Med Educ. 2016; 5(1):1-2.
 20. Beigzadeh A, Rahimi M. The use of games in medical education. Res Dev Med Educ. 2015;4(1):1-2.
 21. Loftin C, Davis LA, Hartin V. Classroom participation: A student perspective. Teaching and learning in nursing 2010; 5(3):119-24.
 22. Liu NF, Littlewood W. Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System. 1997; 25(3):371-84.
 23. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(5):489-97.
 24. Tucker CM, Zayco RA, Herman KC, Reinke WM, Trujillo M, Carraway K, et al. Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low-income African American children. Psychol Sch. 2002; 39(4): 477-88.
 25. Groccia JE. The college success book: A whole-student approach to academic excellence. Lakewood2 CO: Glenbridge Publishing Ltd. 1992.
 26.Tella A. The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &Technology Education 2007; 3(2): 149-56.
 27. Brewer EW, Burgess DN. Professor’s role in motivating students to attend class. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 2005; 42(23): 23-47.
 28. Daggett LM. Quantifying class participation. Nurse Educ. 1996; 22(2):13-4.
 29. Fassinger PA. Understanding classroom interaction: Students' and professors' contributions to students' silence. The Journal of Higher Education 1995: 66(1): 82-96.
 30. Maltby F, Gage NL, Berliner DC, David C. Educational psychology: an Australian and New Zealand perspective. John Wiley; 1995.
 31. Soleimani AH, Mehrnia K. Survey of Tehran University of Medical Sciences medical students' opinions about causes of absenteeism. Iran J Med Educ. 2001; 2(1(7)):73. Persian.
 32. Beigzadeh A, Haghani F. Concept maps and meaningful learning in medical education; perspective. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2015; 12(3):564 -69.
 33. Slavin RE, Davis N. Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. 2006.
 34. Cordova DI, Lepper MR. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of educational psychology. 1996; 88(4):715-730.
 35. Esmaeili M, Haghdoost AA, Beigzadeh A, Bahmanbijari B, Bazrafshan A. Personal and scientific characteristics of positive and negative role models among medical educators from the viewpoint of dentistry and pharmacy Students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2013; 10(3):298-311.
 36. Bijari BB, Zare M, Haghdoost AA, Bazrafshan A, Beigzadeh A, Esmaili M. Factors associated with students’ perceptions of role modelling. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 7:333-39.
 37. Bahmanbijari B, Beigzadeh A, Etminan A, Najarkolai AR, Khodaei M, Askari SM. The perspective of medical students regarding the roles and characteristics of a clinical role model. Electron physician. 2017;9(4):4124-130.
38. Weaver R, Qi J. Classroom organization and participation: College students' perceptions. J Higher Educ, 2005; 76(5):570−601.
39. Howard J R, Henney A L. Student participation and instructor gender in the mixed-age college classroom. J Higher Educ, 1998; 69(4), 384−405.
 40. Woolfolk AE. Educational psychology, 12thed, Boston: Pearson; 2013.
 41. Schunk HD. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6thed, Pearson Education as Allyn and Bacon. 2012.
 42. Festco T, McClure J. Educational psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions. New York: Pearson; 2005.
43. Fisher C, Berliner D, Filby N, Marliave R, Cohen K, Dishow M. Teaching behaviors, academic learning time and student achievement: An overview. In C Denham, A. Liberman (Eds), Time to learn. Washington DC: National institute of Education; 1980.
Future of Medical Education Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2
Summer
June 2019
Pages 10-17

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics