Investigating the Relationship between Personality Dimensions in Selecting a Field Specialty for Medical Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Management and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University o Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: selecting a specialty is one of the most difficult decision of medical practitioners, and this selection depends on personal factors, such as motives and dimensions of personality traits. Therefore, this study investigates relation between of dimensions of Personality traits on selecting the specialty for Medical Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 243 medical students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Data were obtained from two demographics questionnaires and 125-item questionnaire of personality assessment according to Cloninger theory and TCI test. The association among 7 dimensions of personality traits in four groups including surgery-general, internal medicine, diagnostic and psychiatric specialties was assessed by applying SPSS software and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. In this study, a= 0.05 was considered as significance level.
Results: There was a significant difference between men and women in reward dependency, harm avoidance and self-directedness (p <0.05).women had a higher mean in terms of reward dependence and harm avoidance, however, lower mean regarding the self-directedness dimension. There were significant differences regarding personality dimensions, harm avoidance, persistence and self-directedness among specialties (p <0.05), so that harm avoidance, persistence and self-directedness had the highest mean in psychiatric specialty, surgery-general specialty and diagnostic specialty, respectively.
Conclusion: Considering that personality patterns in specialties can be different, thus, awareness of the association between personality traits and the selection of specialty can help students, managers and planners in the future.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.            Bergus GR, Randall C, Winniford MD, Mueller CW, Johnson SR. Job satisfaction and workplace characteristics of primary and specialty care physicians at a bimodal medical school. Acad Med. 2001;76(11):1148-52.
2.            Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B. Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. Jama. 1985;254(19):2775-82.
3.            Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, McMurray JE, Pathman DE, Williams ES, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441-50.
4.            Afzalaghaee M, Tireh H, Fayyazi MR, Zohdi M. The incentives affecting the selection of future specialty of Medical interns. FMEJ. 2018;8(2):28-32.
5.            Kassebaum DG, Szenas PL. Specialty intentions of 1995 US medical school graduates and patterns of generalist career choice and decision making. Acad med. 1995;70(12):1152-7.
6.            Mowbray R. RESEARCH in choice of medical speciality: A review of the literature 1977–87. Aust N Z J Med. 1989;19(4):389-99.
7.            Vaidya NA, Sierles FS, Raida MD, Fakhoury FJ, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR. Relationship between specialty choice and medical student temperament and character assessed with Cloninger Inventory. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):150-56.
8.            Richter J, Neumann R. Personality of students of economics, medicine, and verbal communication: Preliminary results. Psychology 2011;2(03):248.
9.            Zeldow PB, Daugherty SR. Personality profiles and specialty choices of students from two medical school classes. Acad Med. 1991;66(5):283-87.
10.         Hojat M, Zuckerman M. Personality and specialty interest in medical students. Med teach. 2008;30(4):400-6.
11.         Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
12.         Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. American Journal of Psychiatry 2002;159(9):1563-9.
13.         Newton BW, Savidge MA, Barber L, Cleveland E, Clardy J, Beeman G, et al. Differences in medical students' empathy. Acad Med. 2000; 75(12):1215.
14.         Maron BA, Fein S, Maron BJ, Hillel AT, Baghdadi MME, Rodenhauser P, editors. Ability of prospective assessment of personality profiles to predict the practice specialty of medical students. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings; 2007: Taylor & Francis.
15.         Kaviani H, Poor Naseh M. Validation of temperament and character inventory (TCI) in Iranian sample: Normative Data. Tehran University Medical Journal 2005;63(2):89-98.
16.         Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM, Wetzel RD. The temperament and character inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. 1994.
17.         Khorvash F, Vesal S, Mousavi SA, Ghasemi GR, Mehrbod N. Relationship of specialty select and education place with internship students anxiety in 2010. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2013;9(2):162-9.
18.         Mehmood SI, Khan MA, Walsh KM, Borleffs JC. Personality types and specialist choices in medical students. Med teach. 2013;35(1):63-68.
19.         El Sheikh MM, Shaker NM, Hussein H, Ramy HA. Impact of personality temperaments and characters on academic performance and specialty selection among a group of Egyptian medical graduates. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2014;60(5):499-507.
20.         Rizzo A. Temperament and generativity during the life span. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013;1(1):1-31.
21.         Lovejoy C, Nashef S. Surgeons’ personalities and surgical outcomes. The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2018;100(6):259-63.