Effects of a Virtual Classroom in social media platform on the Knowledge of Emergency Department Interns: A Randomized Interventional Trial

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Emergency, Faculty of medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Student Research Committee, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Emergency, Faculty of medicine,Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Background: Emergency medicine has always been a leader in taming new technologies for medical education. Many forms of social media have been reported in medical education with very little quality evidence to clarify their role. In this study we look at a popular multimedia messaging application in our setting and the aim was to evaluate the effects of a virtual classroom in social media platform on the knowledge of emergency department interns.
 Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial carried out on 65 interns divided into lecture (n=31) or virtual classroom (n=34) groups during their emergency medicine rotation. A block randomization method was used. Ten blocks of emergency medicine interns were randomly assigned to either a traditional lecture course on the subject of shock, or a virtual classroom conducted in the Telegram Messenger© via a group chat. Students’ knowledge of the topic was assessed before and after the courses using a pretest and a posttest. The group participating in the virtual classroom were also asked to fill a questionnaire regarding their rate of satisfaction with the method. The results were analyzed using independent and paired t-tests in SPSS software version 21.
Results: The groups were found to be homogenous prior to the course in all demographic variables and their pretest scores. Most students participating in the virtual classroom preferred this method (81.5%) but the majority found it not to be effective in motivating clinical enthusiasm, solidifying knowledge, or exposing their shortcomings (59.3%). The pretest and posttest revealed that both groups’ knowledge had improved (P<0.001) before and after teaching regardless of the method used. But there was no significant difference in posttest scores between the two methods (P=0.788).
Conclusion: A virtual classroom in a social media messaging platform appears to be as effective as a traditional classroom in conveying knowledge, and it is more preferable for the interns. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.       Sherbino J, Frank JR. The power of social media to transform medical education. Postgraduate Med J 2014; 90(1068): 545-6.
2.       Nickson CP, Cadogan MD. Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Aust 2014; 26(1): 76-83.
3.       Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013; 88(6): 893-901.
4.       Cadogan M, Thoma B, Chan TM, Lin M. Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002-2013). Emerg Med J 2014; 31(e1): e76-7.
5.       Scott KR, Hsu CH, Johnson NJ, Mamtani M, Conlon LW, DeRoos FJ. Integration of social media in emergency medicine residency curriculum. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 64(4): 396-404.
6.       Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006; 81(3): 207-12.
7.       Roy D, Taylor J, Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media: Portrait of an emerging tool in medical education. Acad Psychiatry 2016; 40(1): 136-40. 
8.       Pander T, Pinilla S, Dimitriadis K, Fischer MR. The use of Facebook in medical education--a literature review. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2014; 31(3): Doc33. [In German].
9.       Sutikno T, Handayani L, Stiawan D, Riyadi MA, Much Ibnu Subroto I. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which is best for instant messaging? International journal of electrical and computer engineering 2016; 6(3): 909.
10.     Cevik AA, Aksel G, Akoglu H, Eroglu SE, Dogan NO, Altunci YA. Social media, FOAMed in medical education and knowledge sharing: Local experiences with international perspective. Turk J Emerg Med 2016; 16(3): 112-7.
11.     Roberts MJ, Perera M, Lawrentschuk N, Romanic D, Papa N, Bolton D. Globalization of continuing professional development by journal clubs via microblogging: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(4): e103.  
12.     Guseh JS, 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics 2009; 35(9): 584-6.
13.     Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA 2009; 302(12): 1309-15.
14.     Arnbjörnsson E. The use of social media in medical education: A literature review. Creative education 2014; 05(24): 2057-61.
15.     Raupach T, Muenscher C, Anders S, Steinbach R, Pukrop T, Hege I, et al. Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: a randomized trial. Med Teach 2009; 31(9): e431-7.
16.     Triola MM, Holloway WJ. Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ 2011; 11: 4.
17.     Geyer EM, Irish DE. Isolated to integrated: an evolving medical informatics curriculum. Med Ref Serv Q 2008; 27(4): 451-61.
18.     Cartledge P, Miller M, Phillips B. The use of social-networking sites in medical education. Med Teach 2013; 35(10): 847-57.
19.     Carvas M, Imamura M, Hsing W, Dewey-Platt L, Fregni F. An innovative method of global clinical research training using collaborative learning with Web 2.0 tools. Med Teach 2010; 32(3): 270.
20.     Parslow GR. Commentary: the Khan academy and the day-night flipped classroom. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2012; 40(5): 337-8.
21.     Faust JS, Shah KH. The integration of social media into residency curriculum has obstacles. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65(1): 125.