The effect of three methods of follow-up (Short Message Service SMS , telephone and regular) on the quality of life in heart failure patients

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nahavand Paramedical Sciences,Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

3 Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

4 Department of psychology, Faculty of psychology and education science, Porto University of psychology and education science, Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Introduction
Modern methods and telemonitoring manage care and control of chronic diseases has improved, meanwhile, the hospital use traditional methods to teach their patients.
Aim: to compare the effectiveness of three methods of follow-up (SMS, telephone and regular follow up) on the quality of life in heart failure patients.
methods
In the randomized clinical trial, , patients with heart failure admitted to  Emam Ali and Emam Reza hospitals were selected. The patients or dependent relatives of the patients had used mobile phones and text messages with a written consent participated in the study. With a convenience sampling the patients selected and patients randomly assigned to three groups of SMS, telephone and regular follow-up, respectively. Each patient was assessed before and 1, 2, 3 months after discharge respectively.  To collect data, the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire was used. The data  analyezed with software SPSS VER19  by paired t test, repeated measure ANOVA and curves.
 Finding
Twenty five patients assigned to each group.  there  wasn’t statistically significant differences between the quality of life in the telephone follow up before and the first, second and third months, as well as in the regular follow-up (36±12.6, 41.7±14.4, 36.5±13.5 and 36±13.2 respectively) and also there wasn’t significant difference between before discharge and after 3 months in regular follow up (38±17 vs 39.7±17.7). in the follow up via  SMS there was a significant  difference between the quality of life before and the first, second and third  months (49.6±21.5, 43.9±16.6, 39.1±13.8 and 38.4±12.6 respectively).
Conclusion
Because the heart failure patients need different education and follow up, the result of this study showed that SMS follow up can promote the patients’ quality of life, but telephone and usual follow up didn’t change the quality of change in heart failure patients. Hence, follow up by SMS may be considerd in these patients.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome that, due to ventricular dysfunction, the heart is unable to pump blood to the body (1). Signs and symptoms include fatigue; limitations on activities, lung congestion, edema, shortness of breath, and the symptoms gradually affect the performance of daily life (2). Heart failure is one of the most common chronic diseases ­ Progressive and life-threatening to an increased rate of hospitalization, reduced life expectancy and poor quality of life, as well as imposing a heavy burden to family and society (3).

The cost of treatment due to frequent admissions covers the important part of the health costs of different countries (4). The cost of the disease is estimated at $32 billion in 2009 (5). The rate of disability and mortality due to this disease and frequent hospitalization in these patients is also high. (6).

The mortality rate due to cardiovascular disease in Iran is higher than the global statistics (38 %). In fact, heart failure is the most commonly used medical services among other heart conditions, and the rate of re-admission after six months is approximately 44 % (7). The annual cost of heart failure is two percent of the total British health budget, and one out of every four discharged patients is re-admitted within three months (8). The reason for this is the lack of compliance with the drug, diet, and lack of sufficient knowledge and skills to take care of its own. This problem can be prevented using educational interventions. Learning to manage chronic conditions, constitute the basis of self-care. Self-care is very important in congestive heart failure since most health care for these patients away from the healthcare team is monitoring. ( 9 , 10 ) .

After discharge, they often develop symptoms and complication, because the hospital has little opportunity to educate patients. Follow-up care after discharge is essential for self-care education. Follow-up care makes (make a better relationship) between members of the healthcare team and the patient and increase confidence in the patient.

Based on the results of a study with a self-care plan, re-hospitalization and treatment costs have decreased and survival rates and quality of life have increased. Social support (family and social networks) has a positive effect on self-care behaviors. Follow-up the diet and medication is an important parameter in treating heart failure patients (6). After hospital discharge, these patients require optimal disease management and proper nursing care. Recent modern methods, telemonitoring care management and chronic diseases' management has improved, which reduces the number and frequency of hospitalization days and the occurrence of emergency conditions for the patient (13). Phone and SMS follow-up is an inexpensive and easy, organized health care interventions which provide information to chronic patients by providing counseling, patient assessment, emergency support and disease management, which helps to have an independent life and change lifestyle, such as changing diet, exercising, following a diet therapy and improving the quality of life and self-efficacy of the patient. Based on these follow-ups, the diagnosis and follow-up of the doctor's instructions can be managed. It can also be interpreted as heart rate, blood pressure, and blood sugar levels and helped with early diagnosis of complications in emergency situations (14). This care reduces re-hospitalization, mortality, and medical expenses. According to the International Council of Nurses, the use of communication technologies in nursing care of patients has improved, and telephone care eliminates barriers and time and space constraints for medical staff.

Nurses can use fixed-line, SMS, and email for self-care in chronic patients. The two interventions including phone and SMS are the same, but completely separate and the consequence of using either of these interventions is reported separately (15). Telephone follow up goals include increasing compliance with the diet and reducing the patient's stress during discharge through training. (11) The short message service advantage is that patients are able to communicate with their nurse and doctor at any location and time, exchange information, ask questions and get advice from them (16). Patients can also be educated through these communication pathways, and nurses can diagnose a patient's problem and provide a solution. As well as patient self-care and problem solving encouraged to participate in the program (17). However, training patients is a common traditional method which this method, despite raising the knowledge of individuals, has little clinical value (18).

Mobile communications provide an opportunity for care to exit from the monopoly of hospitals and transmitted to the daily living environment for patients and as a supportive and reminder tool to encourage patients to be more involved in their health plans (19). While highlighting the benefits of both methods of follow-up patients, two systematic reviews have expressed different opinions (15, 20) The results of the study by Ferrante et al. indicated that telephone education for three years reduced the mortality and hospitalization of these patients. It was also improved in accordance with the dietary regimen, diet and daily weighing (21). Also, the results of the study by Kannisto et al. showed that the use of mobile phones and SMS in training of chronic patients increases the follow-up of the diet, the timely use of drugs and the positive attitude to treatment (22). In another study by Ditewiget al., the effect of self-care intervention reduced mortality and increased the quality of life, but there was no significant statistical relationship (23). In this context, the present study aimed to compare the efficacy of three methods of follow-up (SMS, telephone, and regular follow-up) on the quality of life among heart failure patients.

Methods

This randomized clinical trial study was conducted randomly. The study population consisted of heart failure patients referring to Imam Ali Hospital and Imam Reza (AS) in Kermanshah.The study lasted from June 2013 to November 2014. Participants were selected by simple sampling, but randomly divided into three groups of SMS follow-up, follow-up, and regular follow-up.To calculate the sample size, the formula for calculating the sample size for comparing the two societies with a confidence level of z=1.96, the test power was 1.28 and the mean of group 1 was 58.4 and the mean of group 2 was 32.5 and the standard deviation of group 1 was 17.7 and the standard deviation of group 2 was 17.5 (21). In each group, at least 10 people and 20% more were estimated for the loss of specimens, 12 were calculated, and according to the availability of samples, 25 in each group, 75 patients were evaluated in the three groups. The criteria for entering them into the study include: using the patient or one of his companions from mobile and text messages, completing written consent, having a functional level of 2 and 3 according to the American Heart Association category, having no work experience in health care centers, diagnosis of heart failure and discharge fraction was less than 40%.

Patients who were reluctant to continue studying, either re-admitted or died during the study were excluded.The data collection tool was Minnesota Living Quality Heart Failure Questionnaire (MIQ).This questionnaire was designed to provide information on the quality of life of patients with heart failure and contains 21 questions, each question being scored on a Likert scale of 0 to 5.The zero number indicates no response (the best case), and the number 5 represents very high (the worst case). For instance, in a question, does the disease cause breathlessness?  For No Answer, the score is zero and very much gets a score of five. Scores range from 0 to 105 points.Whatever the total score is higher indicate a lower quality of life. This questionnaire has a high reliability and validity over other existing questionnaires. Its validity is confirmed by content validity method and its reliability is confirmed by using the test-retest method and with Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.86).The cutting points of quality of life questionnaire with Minnesota heart failure were rated as scores below 24 (good quality of life), score 24 to 45 (mean quality of life), scores greater than 45 (poor quality of life) (24). In this study, the equivalence method was used for confirmation of reliability and this questionnaire was completed with (Quality of Life in Severe Heart Failure Questionnaire) for 20 patients and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.91.

To collect information, patients who were hospitalized for heart failure were identified and in agreement with the department on the day of discharge, the interviewers after explaining the purpose of the study to patients and their companions received written consent from them and entered the study. Then, the quality of life questionnaire was completed and clinical and vital signs were recorded. In the SMS follow-up group, patients' cell phones were trained in terms of access to the Persian menu and if necessary on how to use SMS service.Also, one of the text messages was sent to the patient. In the follow-up group, a phone call was made for 3 months, which was twice a week in the first month and in the second and third months, once a week, between 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. for 10-20 minutes. The calls were conducted by the researcher (first author) with the patient or patient carer. During the conversation, while providing recommendations and asking the patient's condition, the questions were also answered. In the SMS follow-up group, text messages were sent daily to 100 characters a day, six days a week for the first month, and then twice a week during the last two months by the researcher (first author). At the beginning of the study and at the end of the first, second and third months, the Minnesota Quality of Life Questionnaire was completed by phone for the patients in the SMS and telephone follow-up groups. 

The content of phone conversations and messages with the extraction from manuals, books and magazines included assessing dietary and pharmaceutical regimens, physical activity as well as signs of exacerbation of infertility. Ability to answer questions in SMS and phone conversations were considered.In non-intervention group, patients received only routine discharge training.At the end of the study, a questionnaire was completed for patients. Completion of the questionnaire at the end of the first and second months could have made patients sensitive to the study and disturbed with the results, so at the end of the first and second months, no questionnaire was completed in this group. In this study, written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the Ethics Committee License was also received before registration at the Iranian Clinical Trial Center.

The data were collected and coded using SPSS / VER19 software and Kruskal Wallis test, Kolmogorov Smirnov, paired t-test and ANOVA with repeated measures, analysis of variance and independent t-test were analyzed. It should be noted that during the study due to death, three of the participants were excluded so that the statistical analysis was performed on 72 subjects. (23 in the SMS group, 24 in the telephone group and 25 in the control group).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants in the research in three follow-up groups

                     Group

variable

SMS follow-up

Telephone follow-up

Regular follow up

The result of the statistical test

Education level

Illiterate

Elementary

Guidance s

High school

Higher than diploma

9 (39.2%)

6(26.1%)

6(26.1%)

1(4.3%)

1(4.3%)

18 (75%)

4(16.7%)

2(8.3%)

-

-

12(48%)

7(28%)

4(16%)

2(8%)

-

*P≤0.6

marital status

Divorced

Married

Single (widow)

2(8.7%)

19(82.6%)

2(8.7%)

1(4.2%)

16(66.6%)

7(29.2%)

5 (20%)

18(72%)

2(8%)

*P≤0.4

Income

Less than five hundred tomans

Between a half to one million tomans

More than one million tomans

14(60.9%)

 

 

9(39.1%)

 

-

12 (50%)

 

 

9(37.5%)

 

3(12.5%)

21 (84%)

 

 

4(16%)

 

-

*P≤0.08

Job

Free

Unemployed

Employee

Housewife

Farmer

Retired

3(13%)

4(17.4%)

2(8.7%)

6(26.1%)

6(26.1%)

2(8.7%)

5(20.8%)

1(4.1%)

-

15(62.5%)

3(12.5%)

-

3(12%)

1(4%)

1(4%)

14(56%)

3(12%)

3(12%)

*P≤0.1

*Kruskal Wallis Test

Findings

Patients in both groups were homogeneous for all demographic characteristics and disease (Table 1). Of the 24 participants in the telephone follow-up group, there were 9 men (37.5%) and 15 women (62.5%); among the 23 participants in the follow-up group by SMS there were 17 men (73.9%) and 6 women (26.1%), and in the regular follow-up group, there were 11 men (44%) and 14 women (56%). The mean age of participants in the SMS group was 59.7 ± 6.4; in the follow-up group via telephone was 60.42 ± 6.9; and in the regular follow-up group was 67.9 ± 11 years. The mean number of admitted patients in the telephone follow-up group was 1.58 ± 1.5 and in the SMS follow-up group was 2.1 ± 1.5 and in the regular follow-up group was 2.3 ± 1. 3.

The total score of the quality of life questionnaire was compared before intervention and at the end of the first, second and third months in SMS and telephone follow-up groups as well as in the regular follow-up group (Table 2).

The results of t-test showed that there was no significant difference between the pre intervention and the end of the third month in the regular follow-up group.

The results of analysis of variance analysis with repeated values ​​showed that there was a significant difference between the intervention group and the first, second and third months in the follow up group (p <0.0001). However, there is no significant difference between the pre-intervention and the first, second and third months in the telephone follow-up group.

The trend of changes in mean quality of life scores in the two groups of follow-up, telephone and SMS follow-up showed that the SMS follow-up group showed a downward trend (improved quality of life), while in the telephone follow-up group at the end of the first month, scores increased (worsening of quality of life)and did not change much at the end of the second and third months (Figure 1).

Discussions

The findings of the study showed that SMSfollow-up led to an increase in quality of life indicators, but this increase was not significant in the phone follow-up group. The present study is consistent with the results of a study by Albert and et.al in 2014. The results showed that telephone intervention did not have a significant effect on the reduction of re-hospitalization and the occurrence of emergency situations. However, it has increased the ability of patients to take care of themselves and to seek medical follow-up (13). Contrary to the present study, the results showed that telephone interventions reduced stress and erosion and improved performance in patients’  families in both groups (intervention and control, which were discharged according to the traditional program), but this decrease was significantly more in the intervention group. Yan and et.al in the study, with training during discharge and three times a telephone follow up was conducted on 124 Chinese patients. The intervention group has more compliance with the disease and is more familiar with the factors that are involved in a heart attack [25]. The findings are contradictory to the results of these studies, which could be due to the type of telephone intervention that had been contacted three times in Yan's study.

Table 2. Comparison of mean and standard deviation of quality of life in the three groups before and after the intervention by groups

Group

 

Variable

Regular follow up

SMS follow-up

Telephone follow-up

The result of the intergroup statistical test

Mean ±SD

Mean±SD

Mean±SD

Quality of life before intervention

38.04±17

49.6±21.5

36±12.6

***P≤0.06

The quality of life of the first month

---------

43.9±16.6

41.7±14.4

****P≤0.09

Quality of life of the second month

---------

39.1±13.8

36.5±13.5

****P≤0.06

The quality of life of the third month

39.7±17.7

38.4±12.6

36±13.2

***P≤0.04

The result of the statistical test is intra-group comparison

*p≤0.06

F= 23.5

**P≤0.0001

F= 3.96

**P≤0.058

 

*paired t test

**Analysis of variance with repeated values

***Analysis of variance

****Independent t test

 

Figure 1: Mean scores of quality of life before and after months of intervention in the SMS and telephone follow-up group.

There is also a cultural difference between individuals and the level of literacy. Mosavi Far and his colleagues in their study that examined the effect of two follow-ups (telephone and mobile) methods on compliance with diet regimens in diabetic patients showed that both interventions reduced glycosylated hemoglobin levels and the effect of both interventions was statistically similar (19). The results of this study in the follow-up group were inconsistent with the results of the present study. This difference could be due to the better situation of diabetic outpatients compared with the poor condition of patients with heart failure. In another study by Wong et al. in 2011, in the intervention group, dyspnea was reduced and performance improved. Also, edema, the fluid load, and symptoms of the disease increase, but improvement in physical performance did not increase significantly. The measurement criterion is different in the present study with Wang's study. Because the quality of life questionnaire was used in this study, while in the Wong study, two criteria for improving dyspnea and physical activity have been used as an intervention.

Findings from the study by Ferrante et al. Indicated that re-hospitalization rate in the intervention group was 26% and in comparison with the control group which was 31% there was a further decrease, but did not have a significant effect on mortality. Patients in the intervention group had better indicators in the Minnesota Quality of Life Questionnaire, whose effects remained one to three years after the intervention (21). In the study of Scherr et al. in re-hospitalization and worsening conditions, there was a significant decrease between the intervention group (telephone and SMS education) compared to the control group, but there is still a problem using this technology for the elderly (26). In the experimental study conducted by Wong et al. (2013),  SMS education was conducted for 2 years on 44 diabetic patients in China to increase knowledge and moderate lifestyles.In this method, the effect of SMS on prevention of disease, blood sugar control, hypertension and blood pressure was investigated. However, there was no significant difference between the control group (routine care) and the intervention (27). The results of this study were contradictory to the present study, which may be due to a long two-year follow-up or a cultural difference between individuals.

The study had limitations, including: the lack of control of the researchers on the participants ' access to other educational sources, Short-term follow-up (three months) and the need for long-term follow-up, failure to follow some participants' routines, which identified the goal of the study, for patients to resolve the problem, and tried to encourage them to follow the instructions and have a bias in completing self-administered questionnaire, which will carry out generalization of the results with caution.

Conclusion:

The overall aim of this study was to determine the effect of three follow-up methods (SMS, telephone, and follow-up) on the quality of life in patients with heart failure. Patients with heart failure, due to the nature of the disease, require multiple training and follow-up. The results of this study showed that follow-up of patients with SMS was effective on quality of life of these patients, while regular follow-up and constant telephone follow-up could not affect the quality of life of patients. It seems that follow-up patients with SMS are considered in the care of these patients. Considering the effectiveness of the tele-care approach, it is recommended to use virtual follow-up and care methods, such as the creation of blogs and homepages, as well as SMS in the pursuit of similar chronic illnesses, such as heart and brain strokes.

 Acknowledgments

This article was the result of a research project approved by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services under contract 92168 and IRCT code IRCT2013060313568N1. Thus, the researchers state their gratitude to the financial support of the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences as well as the research council of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and the patients who participated in the research.

 

References

1. Brunner L SDS. Medical-surgical cardiac  nursing. 4 ed: Salemi; 2009.

2. Dunbar SB, Butts B, Reilly CM, Gary RA, Higgins MK, Ferranti EP, et al. A pilot test of an integrated self-care intervention for persons with heart failure and concomitant diabetes. Nursing Outlook. 2014;62(2):97-111.

3. Chiang LC, Chen WC, Dai YT, Ho YL. The effectiveness of telehealth care on caregiver burden, mastery of stress, and family function among family caregivers of heart failure patients: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012;49(10):1230-42.

4. Kessing D, Denollet J, Widdershoven J, Kupper N. Investigating a TELEmedicine solution to improve MEDication adherence in chronic Heart Failure (TELEMED-HF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:227.

5. Sllow-Carroll SH, Fern J, Edward S, Shbrook A. Reducing hospital readmissions. Common Wealth Fund Pub. 2011; 5: 1473.

6. Graven LJ, Grant JS. Social support and self-care behaviors in individuals with heart failure: an integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2014;51(2):320-33.

7. F Shojaei . Quality of life in patients with heart failure. Journal of Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2008;14(2):72-8.

8. Dunlay SM, Red field M, Weston SA, Therneau TM, Long K, Shah ND, Roger V. Hospitalizations after heart failure diagnosis a community perspectiv. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;54(18):1695-702.

 9. Chen J, Ross JS, Carlson MD, Lin Z, Normand SL, Bernheim SM, et al. Skilled nursing facility referral and hospital readmission rates after heart failure or myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Medicine. 2012;125(1):100.e1-9.

10. Ruppar TM DJ, Temple J. Medication adherence interventions for heart failure patients: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;14(5):395-404. .

11. Furuya RK, Mata LR, Veras VS, Appoloni AH, Dantas RA, Silveira RC, et al. Original research: telephone follow-up for patients after myocardial revascularization: a systematic review. The American Journal of Nursing. 2013;113(5):28-31; quiz 52, 40.

12. Rafii F SF, Naasher Z, Azarbaad M, Hoseini F. Perspectives of Patients and Nurses on the reality of Learning Cardiac Heart Failure Educational Content. Hayat. 2009;14(3-4):41-55.

13. Albert NM, Levy P, Langlois E, Nutter B, Yang D, Kumar VA, et al. Heart failure beliefs and self-care adherence while being treated in an emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;46(1):122-9.

14. Piamjariyakul U, Smith CE, Russell C, Werkowitch M, Elyachar A. The feasibility of a telephone coaching program on heart failure home management for family caregivers. Heart & lung : the Journal of Critical Care. 2013;42(1):32-9.

15. Inglis SC CR, Dierckx R, Prieto-Merino D, Cleland JGF. Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure (Review). The Cochrane Library. 2015(10):1-261.

16. Cynthia M. Walker BLE, Karen S. Hayes. The Role of a Self-Directed Technology to Improve Medication Adherence in Heart Failure Patients. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2014;10(10):856-63.

17. Wongpiriyayothar A, Piamjariyakul U, Williams PD. Effects of patient teaching, educational materials, and coaching using telephone on dyspnea and physical functioning among persons with heart failure. Applied nursing research : ANR. 2011;24(4):e59-66.

18. Moattari AG M, Beigi P, PishdadGh. Impact of self management on metabolic control indicators of diabetes patients. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2012;11.

19. Mosavi Far SA ZM, Shadan P, Haqani H. Effect of two methods of follow-up (telephone and mobile) on adherence to treatment in patients with diabetes.  Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism. 2011;10(4):11.

20. Gurol-Urganci I dJT, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results ofmedical investigations (Review). The Cochrane Library. 2012(6):1-27.

21. Ferrante D, Varini S, Macchia A, Soifer S, Badra R, Nul D, et al. Long-term results after a telephone intervention in chronic heart failure: DIAL (Randomized Trial of Phone Intervention in Chronic Heart Failure) follow-up. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;56(5):372-8.

22. Kannisto KA, Koivunen MH, Valimaki MA. Use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care services: A narrative literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014; 16(10):e 222.

23. Ditewig JB, Blok H, Havers J, Veenendaal HV. Effectiveness of self management interventions on mortality, hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronich heart failure : a systematic review. Patient Education and Couuseling. 2010; 78: 297-315.

24. Zeighami Mohammadi S,Shahparian M. Quality of Life(Qol) and Some Factors Related in Males with Heart Failure in Karaj and Shahriar Social Security Hospitals.(2010). Journal Of Research Development in Nursing & Midwifery. 2012;8(2):1-13.

25. Yan J, You LM, Liu BL, Jin SY, Zhou JJ, Lin CX, et al. The effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on illness perception and lifestyle after myocardial infarction in China: a randomized controlled trial. International journal of nursing studies. 2014;51(6):844-55.

26. Scherr D, Kastner P, Kollmann A, Hallas A, Auer J, Krappinger H, et al. Effect of home-based telemonitoring using mobile phone technology on the outcome of heart failure patients after an episode of acute decompensation: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2009;11(3):e34.

27. Wong CK, Fung CS, Siu SC, Lo YY, Wong KW, Fong DY, et al. A short message service (SMS) intervention to prevent diabetes in Chinese professional drivers with pre-diabetes: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2013;102(3):158-66.